• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

HSC 2016 Maths Marathon (archive) (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

When doing questions such as "prove that the statement isn't necessarily true," one random example is enough. It wasn't difficult in this question to prove the general case may not be true but for other questions it may be too hard so just find one example that doesn't work and that proves it isn't always true. Good work by the way keep it up! Also make fb and join the convo.
 

Nailgun

Cole World
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
2,193
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

When doing questions such as "prove that the statement isn't necessarily true," one random example is enough. It wasn't difficult in this question to prove the general case may not be true but for other questions it may be too hard so just find one example that doesn't work and that proves it isn't always true. Good work by the way keep it up! Also make fb and join the convo.
What is this convo lel
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

Well done! Yeah, for the second one, the slope of the line is just [f(x+1) - f(x)]/[(x+1) - x] = f(x+1) - f(x), explaining why f'(x) comes out to be f(x+1) - f(x) (or we could've used any other place, like f(t+1) - f(t) for any real t, since the slope is constant).
 

Nailgun

Cole World
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
2,193
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

Well done! Yeah, for the second one, the slope of the line is just [f(x+1) - f(x)]/[(x+1) - x] = f(x+1) - f(x), explaining why f'(x) comes out to be f(x+1) - f(x).
Ohhh lol, I see

Is my explanation still valid though?
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

Ohhh lol, I see

Is my explanation still valid though?
Pretty much. Like the main thing to say was that f'(x) can be calculated just using the gradient formula, which I think you said at the end.
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

Btw, expressions like f(x+1) - f(x) are known as finite forward differences (see here for more info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_difference ). They can be used to approximate derivatives to help solve (numerically) differential equations.

From the series and sequences topic, you may remember that an arithmetic sequence has terms of the form f(n) = an + b. This "a" is f(n+1) - f(n) (the common difference), and is analogous to the derivative of the function mx+b. The sum of n terms of an arithmetic sequence is analogous to integrating a linear function from say 0 to x.
 

Nailgun

Cole World
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
2,193
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

ln(ln(x)) = 1
how to solve for x?
the way i would think about it is when a log = 1
that means the base is equal to the number

so e=ln(x)
and then x=e^e


but Integrands way is smarter lel
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

If C<0 or C=0 then we have no solution

For C>0

e^(ax) = e^(lnC)*e^(bx)
ax = ln(C) + bx
If C<0 or C=0 then we have no solution

For C>0

e^(ax) = e^(lnC)*e^(bx)
ax = ln(C) + bx by equating indices
x = ln(C)/(a-b)
____________________
Alternatively

ax = ln(C) + ln(e^(bx)) using log laws
ax = ln(C) + bx
continue as above
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top