duckcowhybrid
Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 959
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2010
Both.
+1. Although I think practice/experience is really important. You will go nowhere simply by learning the theory. At the same time, I think you have to have that extra degree of thinking. Its not purely mechainical maths.Both.
Really? Which module do you think this is most true for? Volumes/Mechanics I'm guessing.+1. Although I think practice/experience is really important. You will go nowhere simply by learning the theory. At the same time, I think you have to have that extra degree of thinking. Its not purely mechainical maths.
I find that the Coroneos 4U Supplyment is good for Volumes, lots of hard questions and straightforward methods/examples.are those good for volumes as well?
Sif!!!! fitzpatrick is the BEST book. Well, ok I use cambridge and past papers for questions and exercises, but fitzpatrick is the nicest on your eyes when you learn a new topic. For me, the moment I looked at a chapter of explanation in cambridge, my eyes just went off-focus because it just didn't appeal to my eyes enough to read. Haha...well stop using the fitzpatrick book for one thing
And you were having a go at my mate in the other thread. Nice.I failed trials (47/120)
lol "your mate".And you were having a go at my mate in the other thread. Nice.
lol, his imaginary "mate."lol "your mate".
Geez, I'm not sad to the extent that I feel a need to toture young children.Haha, "mate";;;; What a sad boy....
Lol, so you go to Sydney Grammar or some elite selective school? Because I don't think trials get any harder than theirs.fails to realise that not all schools use SAME TRIAL PAPERS.
So are you telling me that you came first with 39%? :rofl:Which means one could be ridiculously harder than another....
You do realise that there's no prize for seconds right?Haha btw, jm01, the person wrote the stuff above is my mate actually, i'm going to log off now.
Ciao
/jchoi logs off.
;;; dot dot dot. Someone please knock some sense into this guy. Do you realise that you're making assumptions on:Geez, I'm not sad to the extent that I feel a need to toture young children.
Lol, so you go to Sydney Grammar or some elite selective school? Because I don't think trials get any harder than theirs.
So are you telling me that you came first with 39%? :rofl:
You do realise that there's no prize for seconds right?
So you're saying that selective schools have the easiest trials??? lmao.2. Selective school = hardest trials
Alright then name another person who used that "lame excuse".3. that you're the first person in the world to use a lame excuse "was my mate"
Sorry, who failed maths?See you fail.
Coming from someone who got 39% in their trials (Y).You assume, you assume that non uniform circ motion will be in the exam, you assume all these "petty" factors.
Pot calling the kettle black?You just sound like a retarded troll in a forum that has nothing else to do but make an arse our of yourself.
Glad you're justifying your math ability (or a thereof lack of ability). But what if I'm not the 'sad' and the 'cunt' that you're saying that I am? Who are you going to blame your result on now? Mr Imaginary living at Complex Number 1? XDPersonally, I'd rather fail maths and HSC than be as sad as a cunt as you are, because no one likes you
Who are you trying to convince?and just to tell you, this isn't an assumption
Do you know what a 'redherring' is?it's a fair judgement from the observation of your lack of logics, and inability to stop yourself from redherring, or should I say "plan diversion!'.
My number of off topic posts = 2/3 * 1045 ??? And you were supporting the idea that I was going to fail HSC maths before .What the fuck are mods doing, clearly 2/3 of this guy's post are fucking offtopic.
:Sjm01 - you're really arrogant and obnoxious.
Phew. Thank god!I really cbf to reply