aulinia
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2021
- Messages
- 133
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2023
My go to as well!!! I do the Australian frontier as my case study and the windschuttle/reynolds debate isDenial of the holocaust Irving vs Lipstadt
My go to as well!!! I do the Australian frontier as my case study and the windschuttle/reynolds debate isDenial of the holocaust Irving vs Lipstadt
i WILL talk about plutarch in every essay i doDoes anyone have fav historians or debates etc you always use for Section 1??
Reynolds and Windschuttle are my whole life hhahaha
i do sparta, julius caesar, and the fall of the roman republicWhat Ancient topics r u doing (sorry to bring ancient into a hisext discussion)
i main ancient why have i never thought of thisi WILL talk about plutarch in every essay i do
oh you NEED to it's my favourite thingi main ancient why have i never thought of this
Omg what why does ur major work sound so goodoh you NEED to it's my favourite thing
methodology, purpose, context, type of history, you can get him in all of them
i don't even do ancient but plutarch was a facet of my major work so i'm very confident in him
i also like bede because i did a lot of hagiographical stuff in my mw too
I love Bede. I love Von Ranke too but just to shit on him for his quest of the absolute.oh you NEED to it's my favourite thing
methodology, purpose, context, type of history, you can get him in all of them
i don't even do ancient but plutarch was a facet of my major work so i'm very confident in him
i also like bede because i did a lot of hagiographical stuff in my mw too
VR: "I wish i could annihilate myself and let the facts speak" why u so dramatic hahahahahaI love Bede. I love Von Ranke too but just to shit on him for his quest of the absolute.
Honestly no one knows it is such a weird ass subjectyall idk what im doing for this subject anyone have any advice ?? i hate history extension so much
i've abandoned it atp i have no hopeHonestly no one knows it is such a weird ass subject
I thought it was just me like its literally so confusing idk what i say half the timeHonestly no one knows it is such a weird ass subject
omg i am so grateful for this i'll exclusively study these dot points tbhNOW MY PREDICTION
Constructing:
They have not assessed us on:
- Role of history.
- Misuse and use of history.
- Forms of history
- Types of history: political, social, economic, environmental, military, academic, popular, national, local, surveys, macrohistories, microhistories, biographies, psychohistories, historical fiction
- Availability of historical evidence.
Case studies:
They have not assessed us on:
- Popular interpretations of perspectives of area of debate.
- The shaping of interpretation: sources and form of communication.
NOW MY PREDICTION
Constructing:
They have not assessed us on:
- Role of history.
- Misuse and use of history.
- Forms of history
- Types of history: political, social, economic, environmental, military, academic, popular, national, local, surveys, macrohistories, microhistories, biographies, psychohistories, historical fiction
- Availability of historical evidence.
Case studies:
They have not assessed us on:
- Popular interpretations of perspectives of area of debate.
- The shaping of interpretation: sources and form of communication.
Also in terms of predictions they haven't assessed us on changing philosophies yet either. That's one of those little wriggly dotpoints like "changing technologies" hidden at the bottom of the syllabus, and considering last years I wouldn't be surprised if they chose it.NOW MY PREDICTION
Constructing:
They have not assessed us on:
- Role of history.
- Misuse and use of history.
- Forms of history
- Types of history: political, social, economic, environmental, military, academic, popular, national, local, surveys, macrohistories, microhistories, biographies, psychohistories, historical fiction
- Availability of historical evidence.
Case studies:
They have not assessed us on:
- Popular interpretations of perspectives of area of debate.
- The shaping of interpretation: sources and form of communication.
herodotus is like the basis of every single one of my essays haha; usually contrasted with Thucydides so I can make that paragraph actually big enoughDoes anyone have fav historians or debates etc you always use for Section 1??
Reynolds and Windschuttle are my whole life hhahaha
same lol i think no matter what they ask tomorrow i will use herodotus and thucydides as well as irving's holocaust denialherodotus is like the basis of every single one of my essays haha; usually contrasted with Thucydides so I can make that paragraph actually big enough