• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

help EMF value (1 Viewer)

AZZD

New Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Messages
11
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
State why the laboratory EMF value is different to the theoretical EMF value.
If this questions was a 4 marker, what would the marks be allocated to and how should i approach this question?
 

Kurosaki

True Fail Kid
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
1,167
Location
Tubbytronic Superdome
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
The observed EMF was different from the theoretical EMF due to non-standard conditions.
Standard conditions: 1 M concentration for reactants, 1 atm pressure for gases, and 25 degrees Celsius, along with pure metal electrodes.
You can see how they affect the EMF observed using the Nernst equation:
, where Q is the reaction quotient (look at equilibrium constants).
 

HeroicPandas

Heroic!
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
1,547
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Nonstandard conditions
Yes this

I suggest that you draw up a theoretical galvanic cell such as one with: magnesium electrode, zinc electrode, magnesium nitrate electroyle, zinc nitrate electrolyte, potassium nitrate salt bridge, then write down 2 half equations. Use these 2 half equations to identify changes to the galvanic cell and how would these changes would affect electrical conductance and the standard conditions (do this first to get the idea then answer the question)
 
Last edited:

strawberrye

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
3,292
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2013
Uni Grad
2018
State why the laboratory EMF value is different to the theoretical EMF value.
If this questions was a 4 marker, what would the marks be allocated to and how should i approach this question?
I think a possible way four marks would be allocated is the following-and logically, you should structure your answers to include the four points as well
1)define theoretical EMF value-i.e. what does it mean, under what conditions it is determined
2)I think this question would be in the context of a question on galvanic cells, i.e. a part of a question, so state the threotical EMF value for the electrode couples given-using your reduction, oxidation equations and electrode potentials as evidence,
3) Highlight the disparity between the lab and theoretical value, i.e. just state them, and explain the non-standard condition-varying condition results in this variation
4)I think if you want to be safe, don't just list say, 3 non-standard conditions that were used, highlight, at least for one of them, what would be the impact on this difference from standard condition-i.e. higher concentration greater than 1 mol/L would mean a higher EMF value than theoretical could be obtained-explain the disparity using the disparities of the condition-apply the chemical knowledge to this situation

If you include the four things above-you will be guaranteed a full 4 marks
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top