http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=define:+inclined&meta= <---- An inclination is not necessarily a concrete decision.
Also, I wasn't arguing in the previous thread about your views on why he was banned, moreso on your statement that numerous BOS mods were also operators in #hsc. Clearly showing you have no clue.
Yet again, you say he could have asked various mods, when you've been told time and time again that he couldn't have asked various mods, because none of them can do anything about it.
I know I'm a fuckwit. As for an immature prat, I think you only have as far as a mirror to look if you're searching for one of those.
Especially for that edit. Also, how much you've contributed to any discussion doesn't determine how mature you are.
In any case, I was commenting on you saying that you don't understand things by finding out from the people who know, which is clearly off the mark by far. If so, you wouldn't need to be wasting money at university.
Back on topic.
Leaving something like this to the politically-correct, the gay sympathisers, academics and researchers is silly.
When you mention 'this' what is it that you mean? I was talking about the theory of homosexuality. That is, whether people are concretely heterosexual, homosexual or bisexual, or there is a scale. This is something some random in the street really can't decide for him/herself because it takes a detailed understanding of the topic in question.
If you're talking about getting people's opinions about homosexuality out into the open, then that is a personal preference. You might like to hear them all. However, after being told everyone's opinion on everything at uni, I'm getting pretty sick of hearing them. My personal preference is just living one's life the way one feels they should. But my opinions are my own.