lolrofllol
Member
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2008
- Messages
- 127
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2009
Dude it's not the actual height but the CHANGE in height from 40, you know? So 0.232 * 25 (65 - 40 = 25) + 1.2 = 7 <br><br>Did you even check to see if your equation worked? I got your answer originally however after plugging in values for x and realising it was WAY out i was able to work out how to solve it. Extrapolate line, measure amount. Then do gradient which i took from y= 7 down to y = -1.2, divide this by 65 which is from 0 to 65 on the extrapolation. Gradient = 0.1261. Y intersects at -1.2. Therefore y = 0.1261x - 1.2. Checked that equation and i was able to do y = 0.1261x(65) - 1.2. This gives 7. Looking at the graph 65 cm corresponds to 7 kg. Maybe im wrong but thats how i'm seeing it, can anyone else clarify this?. Also if u use y=0.232x(65)+1.2 = 16.28 kg. This cant be as 65 clearly corresponds to 7 kg.
EDIT: you probably wont get very accurate answers with other values because it's only correlation? i'm not sure. I did my answer and i'm not sure if it's right, it's just the way i did it.
Last edited: