Rattlehead15
Well-Known Member
I agree with you he shouldn't be censored. Idk what the issue is I think we're on the same page.
Because freedom of speech. Even though I disagree with a lot of what he says, he still has a right to voice his opinions. If Tate is de-platformed, radical LGBTQ activists should be de-platformed too if we look at extremes.why?
You don't have the right idea and I disagree with you considering you think the real problem is that people supposedly "mindlessly follow him."I agree with you he shouldn't be censored. Idk what the issue is I think we're on the same page.
Quran 4:34so ur saying what he does (misogynism) is representative of his religious identity?
Herein lies the problem for me, what is Healthy Masculinity, because no one can really define it. These days it seems that "Healthy Masculinity" is defined by what it is not, as opposed to what it is. Any attempt to define masculine characteristics is often derided as sexist, which is a huge issue because it is leaving a generation of boys without an identity. Characteristics like competitiveness, emotional resilience and toughness are frowned upon despite boys and men in general valuing these qualities. There is nothing inherently wrong with these qualities either, it just seems as if the feminist movement is determined to undermine the distinct identity of males.The initiative, known as the “Healthy Masculinities Project,” is poised to launch next year as a three-year trial, supported by $3.5 million in funding.
Bro just really pasted what I saidHerein lies the problem for me, what is Healthy Masculinity, because no one can really define it. These days it seems that "Healthy Masculinity" is defined by what it is not, as opposed to what it is. Any attempt to define masculine characteristics is often derided as sexist, which is a huge issue because it is leaving a generation of boys without an identity. Characteristics like competitiveness, emotional resilience and toughness are frowned upon despite boys and men in general valuing these qualities. There is nothing inherently wrong with these qualities either, it just seems as if the feminist movement is determined to undermine the distinct identity of males.
To be clear, I dont like Andrew Tate or Jordan Peterson for that matter. I think both are just snake oil salesmen peddling easy answers. However, I can see why young boys flock to them both. Unfortunately, the feminist movement has denied men a safe space in the mainstream to be themselves, which has pushed them towards the extreme ends of the spectrum. I'm not an anti-feminist by any stretch, but I see the movement in general becoming something which it sought to destroy - that is the silencing of the opposite sex.
Id support this program if it actually offered men and boys something other than telling them what they are doing wrong and what not to do. Im all for if it encourages healthy male qualities.