General Thoughts - Ancient History (1 Viewer)

[guyzbabigal]

I thought the exam was pretty gud, cept for that water fountain question which was hard i thought, the rest of it was good expectancy and yeah, could write

 

[ludemeister]

OH MY GOS SOOO TRUE..... THATS A LOAD OF SHIT IF U THINK UR GONNA GET ANYWHERE WITH SITTING IN AN EXAM FOR A BLOODY HOUR...U GOTTA BE PSYCHO OR ABNORMAL OR SOMETHING...IT TOOK ME THE WHOLE FREAKING THREE HOURS AND MANY WEEKS OF STUDY PRIOR!!!!:rofl:

yeh agreed.
only-used-1-hour = epic-fail (probably. but i'd love u 2 prove me wrong).
i used up all the time, was writing hectically until he said to stop.

 

[natalyap]

I found it hard to get 12 marks though for mummification, that was a bit ridiculous.
we managed to get the relationship with thutIII question in our trial, exactly the same and the Asses achievements was much like a question in our half yearly. so Hatshepsut was very good.

 

[dsruptdSPuNKRaT]

i well and truly fucked it lulz left after an hour and half. if my teacher had've actually taught me i think i may have done more, but oh well i tried my best

 

[richgirl.cc]

Liked it a lot - was my second best exam....I worked backwards through the paper starting from easiest and left pompeii for last. I looked at the water transport q for pompeii and I was like whattttt???? I didn't even study for that! Made up some stuff about lead pipes and water storage tanks at crossroads and stuff and did alright. Band 6!!!:uhhuh:

 

[altiste]

Easiest Exam Ever! Our trial was soooo much harder! I finished after an hour and 10 minutes. Looking at mid to high 90s.

DazzaX

There's a fine line between confidence and hubris. I found the exam really hard, as did many other people i'm sure, and would kinda appreciate it if the historical genii of our generation didn't rub it in.