noworriez1
Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2011
- Messages
- 456
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- N/A
Gaddafi was not bad
I do not condone violence
nor do i condone killing
but look at it this way..
I do not intend to be racist when I say this, but the middle-east is not as morally, technologically and politically as developed as the west (agree?)
When one defies the rule of a king, he would respond with death for the stability of his society... Now this was back in the western medieval era
The middle-east is largely still run in this manner
He was just following tradition and also Islamic tradition
I agree that he did need to be replaced or at least his rule reformed but did not deserve the over-exaggerations in the Jew controlled media
Also,
he did a hell of a lot for the libyan economy
"Gaddafi's efforts also improved the average health of Libyans. In 2009, the CIA's World Factbook showed the average life expectancy of a Libyan to be 77 years (only one year less than that of an American citizen)."
"By the 1980s Libyans enjoyed much improved housing and education, comprehensive social welfare services, and general standards of health that were among the highest in Africa."
for fucks sake
im just sick of people saying "he was EVIL, im glad hes dead"
and there was a poll with 70% of people condoning his slaughter by the libyan revolt (and these were all western people)
we are just as bad
SUM UP:
1. He was following tradition that has been ingrained in him since birth
2. He should have been replaced or reformed but not scrutinised/killed as much as he has been
3. he improved the economy dramatically
and
4. Sharia law is going to hit them harder than gaddafi's iron-fist
Now why would they revolt against him if he was good?
- Simple
He placed heaps of restrictions in islamic law and tradition and they did not like that
e.g.
He did not condone multiple wives for instance and restricted it to one partner
as soon as they killed him, they re-implemented multiple wives (literally a day after he died)
they are extremist islamic whilst he was more moderate
and the jews + israel just wanted to take advantage of this event to bring them a next step closer to controlling the middle-east
EDIT: CIA was definitely directing the rebellion..
they had it in for Gaddafi since the 1960s and have attempted numerous assassinations plots
"Numerous press reports over the weekend add to the evidence that the Libyan rebels fighting the regime of Muammar Gaddafi are under the direction of American intelligence agencies. Despite the repeated claims by Obama administration officials that the rebels are a largely unknown quantity, it is becoming increasingly clear that key military leaders of the anti-Gaddafi campaign are well known to the US government and have longstanding relations with the CIA."
All the worlds a stage at this point and our attention diverted, whilst they are developing something covertly.
http://wsws.org/articles/2011/apr2011/liby-a04.shtml
thoughts? debate?
I do not condone violence
nor do i condone killing
but look at it this way..
I do not intend to be racist when I say this, but the middle-east is not as morally, technologically and politically as developed as the west (agree?)
When one defies the rule of a king, he would respond with death for the stability of his society... Now this was back in the western medieval era
The middle-east is largely still run in this manner
He was just following tradition and also Islamic tradition
I agree that he did need to be replaced or at least his rule reformed but did not deserve the over-exaggerations in the Jew controlled media
Also,
he did a hell of a lot for the libyan economy
"Gaddafi's efforts also improved the average health of Libyans. In 2009, the CIA's World Factbook showed the average life expectancy of a Libyan to be 77 years (only one year less than that of an American citizen)."
"By the 1980s Libyans enjoyed much improved housing and education, comprehensive social welfare services, and general standards of health that were among the highest in Africa."
for fucks sake
im just sick of people saying "he was EVIL, im glad hes dead"
and there was a poll with 70% of people condoning his slaughter by the libyan revolt (and these were all western people)
we are just as bad
SUM UP:
1. He was following tradition that has been ingrained in him since birth
2. He should have been replaced or reformed but not scrutinised/killed as much as he has been
3. he improved the economy dramatically
and
4. Sharia law is going to hit them harder than gaddafi's iron-fist
Now why would they revolt against him if he was good?
- Simple
He placed heaps of restrictions in islamic law and tradition and they did not like that
e.g.
He did not condone multiple wives for instance and restricted it to one partner
as soon as they killed him, they re-implemented multiple wives (literally a day after he died)
they are extremist islamic whilst he was more moderate
and the jews + israel just wanted to take advantage of this event to bring them a next step closer to controlling the middle-east
EDIT: CIA was definitely directing the rebellion..
they had it in for Gaddafi since the 1960s and have attempted numerous assassinations plots
"Numerous press reports over the weekend add to the evidence that the Libyan rebels fighting the regime of Muammar Gaddafi are under the direction of American intelligence agencies. Despite the repeated claims by Obama administration officials that the rebels are a largely unknown quantity, it is becoming increasingly clear that key military leaders of the anti-Gaddafi campaign are well known to the US government and have longstanding relations with the CIA."
All the worlds a stage at this point and our attention diverted, whilst they are developing something covertly.
http://wsws.org/articles/2011/apr2011/liby-a04.shtml
thoughts? debate?
Last edited:
