WorkChoices was a brilliant, economically-sound piece of legislation designed to carry on the trade liberalisation (in this case the trade of labour) and microeconomic reform begun by Labor in the early 1990s. Howard has my eternal respect for being ballsy enough to introduce such a politically devestating law for the greater good of the country and the economy.
Now, I'm sorry if some people lost their jobs, ended up with a pay cut or did not have the negotiating skills necessary to barter for extra benefits, but plenty of people actually benefitted from WorkChoices too. Unfortunately, their stories always go unheard under the ruckass kicked up by sinking-ship unionists and their unskilled sob stories.
ON a side note; apparently Abbott's daughters are really fucking bitchy. But they're all still boneable.
The problem with WorkChoices was not that it was faulty legislation, it was good IN THEORY...
It's issue was its implementation... being ballsy isn't good enough. Howard's government introduced the Legislation and due to their trouncing of the Labor party in the previous election was able to push the legislation through before the public had any idea what was going on.
Suddenly the nature of Workplace relations in this country had changed... and big sweeping change affecting people's lives does NOT go down well. Also the fact that Workchoices WAS abused by employers the same as previous protections were abused by (for example) lazy workers.
THIS is why it was a problem. It wasn't approached like a broad sweeping change of this nature should have been. With studys and test runs that were shown to the public to be effective. Because it WAS effective... But people needed to know this. They needed to know that the system was more likely to help them than hinder them... unless they were raging thundercunts who were shit at their jobs but couldn't be retrenched because of protections.
And it didn't matter if it was economically sound, the Costello Treasury under Howard was actually despite what many believe, terrible for the economy. It was a hollow "strong" economy with hailed "surpluses" that were just more than the government expected to earn and an excuse to lower taxes despite this not helping at all