Airness said:
Dreamerish wasn't putting her morality up as a social standard. It was simply her standard. And she was criticising the girl based on HER standards. Which is why she said different people have different moral sensibilities. Obviously you have a different one. We don't really give a shit. But if you come on here and tell us about it, then be prepared for us to impose our moral standards on yours and rip your shit apart. We have every right to judge you. Don't like it? Don't tell us about it.
who is 'we'? who doesn't really give a shit, you and dreamerish? or are you providing an opinion on behalf of the entire forum?
spas_wink@hotmail.com
there's my email address, i'd appreciate it if you'd let me know when your efforts actually get you into dreamerish's pants. just an interested third party, is all
Airness said:
Also, are you going to now condemn her cookie cutter sense of morality because your sense of morality is different? Your sense of morality guides you to judge Dreamerish's opinion as unworthy of a modern society and to brand her as a bad person. What gives you the right to do that? Aren't you contradicting your own idiotic rules?
yes, i am going to condemn her cookie cutter sense of morality, yes i'm going to contradict my own idiotic rules, and yes, i did plan before posting to hand out a trophy to everyone who was clevar enough to point it out. well done, eagle eye!
Airness said:
Now shut the hell up and think before you say anything again. Your senseless rhetoric sounds like insubstantial diarrhea.
And that has no place in any society.
"Your senseless rhetoric sounds like insubstantial diarrhea."
better check the oven man, i hate to say it but i think you're overcooking. though if large, unneccesary words and description gets the ladies, far be it from me to mess with your formula