wendybird
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 316
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2009
You're right. EE1 and Eng Adv is quite different, and as someone who considered English my best subject, my view is that EE1 is DEFINITELY harder than Eng Adv.How can you interpret that EX1 is easier than Adv. Eng. from looking at a pile of books, most of which is for EX1?
Let me clarify why:
1. EE1 essays are written in a very different style to Eng Advanced ones. The emphasis is very much on paradigms and contexts. You HAVE TO get deep into the philosophy and ways of thinking that UNDERLY the texts, in addition to the actual analysis of the texts.
The only way I can analogize it is perhaps in terms of science. In Eng Adv, you analyse to one layer - just as a casual observer might look at a plant and observe its features, how it looks, feels, smells etc. But in EE1 you look at things to a deeper degree and engage with further layers in your analysis. So for example, a scientist might look at the same plant and be able to understand the underlying processes - respiration, photosynthesis, growth etc, and components.
And that is a direct requirement of markers and the rubric - this deeper level of engagement. To do well WILL require students to stretch themselves.
2. Sure, there are fewer texts, but the degree of analysis and research that goes into understanding each text is MUCH higher than for Eng Adv. I literally have a box of journal articles and photocopied literary analyses for EACH one of Coleridge's poems. Sure the poem is not long (4/5 pages), but the amount of time spent on each one was exorbitant.
Basically, in EE1, you get alot less bang for your buck. You have to do a heck of a lot more work for considerably less result/gain.
What I'm trying to say, is NOT that EE1 is horrifyingly difficult. But I'm saying, the course isn't really for ppl who think they can get away with little work. Frankly, I worked harder and spent more time on EE1 than on Eng Advanced. The course is for people who think they might really enjoy spending time analysing texts in depth and to really engage with a particular paradigm.
Sorry for diverging from the topic. Now to answer the OP's question? Is EE1 worth it? It depends.
- For good/top english students who will thrive on this kind of stuff, the intellectual stimulation is very rewarding. While I liked Eng Adv, I loved EE1 because I could bring in all my thinking about philosophy and history into the course. Its a course that rewards original thinking and the ability to show off flair.
- For students who don't reallly like english or struggle at english, no, I don't think that the extra work you will have to do in order to do well at EE1 is worth it. Most students (friends who in the end attained 99+ ATAR) who were ok but didn't thrive on English ended up dropping. They were getting low to mid 90s for Eng Adv but as low as 70s for EE1.
- But in Yr 11, you have nothing to lose. I'd suggest everyone to try it out in Yr 11 and drop or keep the course depending on how it goes.
ETA: Don't kid yourself, EE1 scales well, but its about as well as Eng Adv. There is no real substantial scaling benefit. Compare this with Maths Extension 1 - much higher scaling benefit in comparison.
Last edited: