It's extremely interesting reading many of your comments, particularly yours, spin. Indeed my eyes have been widened - (not opened as they were never closed) to the fact that there are many a young literary genius among us. Obviously, these students were the more deserving of high marks in this course and I am biting at the bit to view poetry that achieved a mark of 50. In order to understand my flaws, I need to compare my work with these masterpieces of literature. I thank you for your comments, Spin - however I do want to highlight the fact that not all students who did poetry and achieved a lower mark necassarily wrote cliche teenage drivel. Indeed, I set out to avoid this - I did nature poetry. Therefore, as you also stated, my flaws must lie in my technique. I never once contemplated blaming 'bias' markers (if there is such a thing) for my sub-par mark - as was previously inferred. I take much of your advice with interest and I agree with the fact that a lower mark for poetry most probably was owed to a lack of maturity - not so much in age, but in regard to literature and the reading and thorough appreciation of poetry of all different genres and styles. Perhaps this is also an area I find myself lacking in now - and your comments have made me realise this. Thankyou.