• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Dot point 2.4 in quanta to quarks (1 Viewer)

me121

Premium Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
1,407
Location
-33.917188, 151.232890
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
from my notes/biki:

Because these orbiting electrons can be thought of as waves, where the shell number relates to the number of waves, if you have non integer number of waves then the wave will not join and will collapse. So electrons can only exist where a whole number of waves is possible. This coincided with the specific orbits that Bohr had postulated. Since the electron could exist as a wave it was in a non-radiating energy level as also postulated by Bohr.

image:
http://www.boredofstudies.org/wiki/images/f/f2/Sci_phys_quanta_de_broglie.png
 

Forbidden.

Banned
Joined
Feb 28, 2006
Messages
4,436
Location
Deep trenches of burning HELL
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
me121 said:
from my notes/biki:

Because these orbiting electrons can be thought of as waves, where the shell number relates to the number of waves, if you have non integer number of waves then the wave will not join and will collapse. So electrons can only exist where a whole number of waves is possible. This coincided with the specific orbits that Bohr had postulated. Since the electron could exist as a wave it was in a non-radiating energy level as also postulated by Bohr.

image:
http://www.boredofstudies.org/wiki/images/f/f2/Sci_phys_quanta_de_broglie.png
You should be a moderator for the Physics section in addition to Industrial Technology.
You take pride in HSC Physics and beyond.
 

samwell

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
400
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Forbidden. said:
You should be a moderator for the Physics section in addition to Industrial Technology.
You take pride in HSC Physics and beyond.
She/he is already a moderator lol.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top