tommykins said:Done all that, no reply.
And I don't think I can lead to 'faith'.
It's like doing a maths question and having 'faith' and skipping 4-5 lines of working to arrive at an answer.
Darnie said:can you point me to a book (or group of books) that have history of climatic and geometric events from that era?
Coz ur not interpwetting it rite deekhednottu said:Why would I believe anything in the bible when it also says there was a talking snake that tried to get two people to eat an apple, and some old frail man somehow got two of every animal on earth into a boat.
you're a jokekangms said:Yes God exists.
therefore having no actual evidence that it is true... ?hermand said:do you not find that demeaning? to be told that no matter what you do, that you deserve hell?
also, isn't the bible not historically true? but supposedly 'spiritually' true?
Oh sorry, I'll read the bible again and try to interpret it properly this time.nikolas said:Coz ur not interpwetting it rite deekhed
http://uncrediblehallq.net/blog/?p=44Lukybear said:Here for all you athiests, i found something very interesting on the internet; The Comsmological Arguement on God's Existence...
http://www.onlinedebate.net/forums/showthread.php?t=15307
The logic is easy to see with credible SCIENTIFIC information with credible sources stated... If you still cant see it, ill even summarise it if requested...
did u actually read his full arguement? It argues for the most probable...Kwayera said:
Link said:4) Naturalistic explanations are insufficient in comparison to God in explaining this cause.
I am not, merely, that link was arguing for the most probable as shown by science. That the Universe was created by a conscious omnipotent being is more probable then any other SCIENTIFC explanation out there, ie multiverse...John Oliver said:You can't just arbitrarily state a postulate.
Did you read the rebuttals in that very thread?Lukybear said:did u actually read his full arguement? It argues for the most probable...
I have no idea how you could assign probability to such a thing.lukybear said:I am not, merely, that link was arguing for the most probable as shown by science. That the Universe was created by a conscious omnipotent being is more probable then any other SCIENTIFC explanation out there, ie multiverse...