Yeah, 3unitz, I'm glad you noted that in the passage that *true* quoted. To bring out the relevant part:
*TRUE* said:
I will destroy the wisdom of the wise and the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate. Where is the wise man, where is the scholar, where is the philosopher of this age?
Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world, for since in the wisdom of God, the world through its wisdom did not know Him
My naive reading is as follows: god somehow transcends our worldly means of seeking knowledge and wisdom and thus, if we are to know god, we must cast aside our usual rational methods and somehow
see the truth (through jesus/faith/gospels or some such).
This really exemplifies the kind of anti-rationality clauses that are scattered through religious texts. The passage seems to draw a line in the sand. On on side you stand amidst the methods of logic and empirical method (or, at least, of some
critical form of theory), and on the other is unreasoned, seeing acceptance.
What really bothers me is that there are many things, an infinite number in fact, which could simply be accepted through faith. And yet you are
highly selective about what you choose. To me this implies that either you are being determined by cultural forces or you are using some kind of decision procedure, i.e. some kind of reasoned decision is taking place. Thus you are either passive recipients of cultural beliefs, which would really undermine your position I feel, or you are making use of some thus far undescribed decision procedure which gets cloaked in terms like 'faith' and 'transcendental perception'. There seems to be dishonesty in the air: reason cannot lead to god, and yet it must be used in some fashion in order to exclude other possible faith-based claims.