Kwayera
Passive-aggressive Mod
Jared, while I appreciate the literary weight of your source, it ought to be said that they are indeed speaking from a religious point of view, not a scientific one (which is that it generally is far more likely that existence, as we'd define it, is not a product of divinity: that indeed can be described with mathematical precision, and I'd also like to direct you to the principle of Ockham's Razor. Even religious scientists generally accept that the universe itself is more likely than not to have no need for a divine creator).
The point is that the heavily religious will always find more credibility in a world with a God, and the non-religious will always find more credibility in a world without. Because neither can ever be proven, it is generally a matter of opinion (or, indeed, faith); however, mathematical 'certainty' can certainly be applied to the lack of existence of a God. There is no "God constant" in the laws the describe the universe, and no need of them.
The point is that the heavily religious will always find more credibility in a world with a God, and the non-religious will always find more credibility in a world without. Because neither can ever be proven, it is generally a matter of opinion (or, indeed, faith); however, mathematical 'certainty' can certainly be applied to the lack of existence of a God. There is no "God constant" in the laws the describe the universe, and no need of them.