this always blows me away- You need to be up here
|
|
|
- Highly literate individual
|
|
|
- Average population
|
|
|
- High School Teachers
|
|
|
- You (I hope not, just shits and giggles, I'm sure you will cope, however, it is a steep learning curve)
I actually laugh at how some teachers mark assessments in a Law degree... You would usually get a average or slightly above average tick mark for: grammar, spelling and punctuation... However, throughout the actual assignment, they would not actually prompt you to why they gave that reasoning... The same goes with AGLC... my references were flawless, still don't know why my "compliance with AGLC" marks were pretty much average as well...
It is all subjective assessment which is an absolute crock of shit if I were to tell it to you straight...
law is more about how you interpret things and are able to write out what you've interpreted in plain languageWould a mid band 5 in English be good enough to cope with law?
I think this would apply to every uni course. HSC is not a good indicator for university (some HD student said today)law is more about how you interpret things and are able to write out what you've interpreted in plain language
how well you did in HSC english is not a good indicator of your ability to cope with it
is correct although I think 3u/4u maths is somewhat transferable to engineering courses from what i'm hearing (at least in first year) so maybe that's an exceptionI think this would apply to every uni course. HSC is not a good indicator for university (some HD student said today)
They were double posts I tried to delete but for some reason it wasn't letting meThem full stops hahaha
I did standard english as well. Learn to understand rather than mindlessly memorising information. Writing well in an essay on poems and plays won't be indicative of your ability to excel in Law.So I am doing HSC standard course and band 6 level, would that be fine? or it would be hard to study law at this level?