Discuss This. (2 Viewers)

[Karlmarx]

ARGUMENT FROM CREATION, a.k.a. ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INCREDULITY (I)
(1) If evolution is false, then creationism is true, and therefore God exists.
(2) Evolution can't be true, since I lack the mental capacity to understand it; moreover, to accept its truth would cause me to be uncomfortable.
(3) Therefore, God exists.


Proof that people who believe in God are idiots.

Hundreds of Proofs of Gods Existence

 

[mirakon]

That's a joke site and is not worthy of intellectual discussion unless one is enough of a douche to take it seriously.

 

[jb_nc]

ARGUMENT FROM CREATION, a.k.a. ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INCREDULITY (I)
(1) If evolution is false, then creationism is true, and therefore God exists.
(2) Evolution can't be true, since I lack the mental capacity to understand it; moreover, to accept its truth would cause me to be uncomfortable.
(3) Therefore, God exists.


Proof that people who believe in God are idiots.

Hundreds of Proofs of God�s Existence

shut up faggot

 

[Ritard_]

jb nc you just dont put the effort in anymore
disappointing m8

 

[violentdelights]

Yeah, seriously shut up
Karl Marx would be ashamed of your incessant whining

No one is denying evolution
And if they do, who cares?? Like, carry on with whatever petty stuff you do. You complain all the time, how annoying.

 

[Ritard_]

What's the harm? - Archives - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com

 

[Ritard_]

Criticism of Islamism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[violentdelights]

Criticism of Islamism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

cool

 

[Ritard_]

Apostasy in Islam - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[onur91]

anything else?

 

[Ritard_]

ye

argument from design - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com

faith - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com

theist - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com

Faith is a non-rational belief in some proposition. A non-rational belief is one that is contrary to the sum of the evidence for that belief. A belief is contrary to the sum of the evidence if there is overwhelming evidence against the belief, e.g., that the earth is flat, hollow, or is the center of the universe. A belief is also contrary to the sum of the evidence if the evidence seems equal both for and against the belief, yet one commits to one of the two or more equally supported propositions.

m8

 

[Ritard_]

I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. --Stephen F. Roberts

ye

 

[onur91]

Thanks mate, it's all quite interesting. I mean who knew the factual sites such as skeptic.com and wikipedia could be so enlightening. Thanks!

 

[violentdelights]

I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. --Stephen F. Roberts

ye

mad

too cool 4 skool

 

[Ritard_]

skeptics.com is run by science guys okay

using science to explain complete shit that is passed off as truth

wikipedia = citations m8
citations
follow the citations

 

[onur91]

hahaha okay then i'll put my complete trust into these 'science guys'.

 

[Ritard_]

m8

faith - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com

true-believer syndrome - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com

true believer syndrome okay

Robert T. Carroll biographical info - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com

anyway, i would believe most things this guy writes, because like he uses intext citations and science i guess idk

 

[bazrah]

skeptics.com is run by science guys okay

using science to explain complete shit that is passed off as truth

wikipedia = citations m8
citations
follow the citations

A quote from the "science guys" on "Science".

Scientific explanations are in terms of natural phenomena rather than supernatural phenomena, although science itself requires neither the acceptance nor the rejection of the supernatural.

 

[Ritard_]

but yes i see how you could discredit him somehow

imagine

being a free thinker

 

[Ritard_]

A quote from the "science guys" on "Science".

Scientific explanations are in terms of natural phenomena rather than supernatural phenomena, although science itself requires neither the acceptance nor the rejection of the supernatural.

yes that is completely true?