CLAW1001 Thread (1 Viewer)

[yvonne_710]

why ppl wanna notes just b4 the exam................

 

[kow_dude]

I am so dead with week 12's tute!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[yvonne_710]

i still think week 9 is harder..very hard actually.............

 

[sarevok]

shit, i thought this exam was on tomorrow >_< been cramming crazily all night

 

[kow_dude]

hahahahahah... LOL!!!!

 

[Toodulu]

SOGA and TPA are in it
misrepresentation is in it
mistake isn't

 

[kow_dude]

Then what was the point of covering mistake in lectures? It wasn't even in the practise exam.

 

[yvonne_710]

claw is the last exam for me, errrrrrrr.....very annoying to wait the end of essay-style exam over...

 

[leila]

w9 tut answer someone..... i'll be extremely appreciated...thanx

 

[Toodulu]

mistake was covered because it's in the course, but not in the exam
why complain about not having more in the exam? i think it's because you should really look through misrepresentations and focus on that instead.
also, it won't hurt to read through the supp notes on statute terms

 

[QuaCk]

what's 'reading 7 and 8' that the exam notes are referring to?
and are they available on bb? i've tried checking but didn't find anything.

i havn't been to many lectures :|

 

[sarevok]

It means the supplementary reading module. You were meant to get it from a box in the E+B building.

 

[sarevok]

It means the supplementary reading module. You were meant to get it from a box in the E+B building.

 

[QuaCk]

was that the one for week 4 and 5?
about smoke ball and some other crap?

 

[sarevok]

No, there was a second one, the one with the Duff Beer case.

 

[QuaCk]

ahhhh fuck

rkn lecture notes alone will suffice in exams?
i'm jsut hoping for a pass, nothing flash.

 

[yvonne_710]

i hope no tut12 or tut 9 in the exam............they are very annoying

 

[yvonne_710]

for tut 9, do u guys think there is frustration in the case???

 

[Toodulu]

you should argue both ways yvonne
it depends on
- the severity of the destruction
- whether it was foreseeable

 

[yvonne_710]

you should argue both ways yvonne
it depends on
- the severity of the destruction
- whether it was foreseeable

i think there is frustation, well, someone said there is no frustration though.........