Good on him. It's about time the medical profession showed some morality beyond 'do not resuscitate' orders. Abortion has infiltrated too far into the public sphere with little opposition out of fear of being anti-feminist - an attitude born by feminist operatives such as Catherine MacKinnon and Germaine Greer. The result? Abortion is taught in schools and presented as a medical treatment as if it was the first port of call and the only realistic option. This chemist will do much to reverse that attitude back to the one called for by the almighty.
What are you talking about!? There is A LOT of opposition towards abortion. Abortion is illegal in much of the world, and powerful nations like the United States actually withdraw funding to medical clinics in other parts of the world if they allow or even have information there on abortion, EVEN if it is legal in the country of the clinic. Even the legal rulings on abortion in the United states caused controversy because it was all decided by the supreme court, no voting in this DEMOCRATIC nation occured. To say there is no opposition to it is SO naive.
It is not only about women's rights. To be 'pro-choice' does not directly reflect a person's attitude towards feminism. There is also a lot of controversy surrounding this matter as it is the woman's decision to keep the child or terminate it. The father has NO say. This leaves the father open to all sorts of legal liabilities, monetary liabilities not to mention the psychological impact it would have on the father. The mother isn't the only one to consider in these situations.
I don't think it is right to deprive women and men of contraceptives because it is against his religion. I am catholic, and I think there is already enough negativity associated with religion because of the extremists who "force" their religion on other people.
There have also been many studies that have proven that the administration of contraceptives and the morning after pill actually reduces the number of abortions because less unplanned pregnancies occur.
So, if it is really about his religious morals he should be asking himself 'what is worse: administering contraceptives or a possible increase in rates of abortion?'