davin said:
The issue is that it doesn't always work...simply believing isn't a guarantee and many people will choose these solutions rather than actual, proven, medical solutions because they see them as equal. That costs lives....not just the lives of the people making the decision, but more worrisome, imo, is when parents make those choices for kids that are in need of medical treatment.
i think you have to realise in context
of course believing isnt a guarantee... but if faith alone helps.. and DOES NOT harm.. there is little to no reason to hurt a family's chance..
certainly 1 in a 250,000 chance to recovery is usually a good time to try the witchdoctor..
Proven medical solutions are good...but you cant force them on ppl without consent and with some there is significant side effects that ppl feel lessen their quality of life.
e.g. Nitrates do not allow u to take Viagra (Sildenafil) or Cialis (Tadalafil) for erectile difficulties cos u can get heart failure.. or u can live without sex..
I feel parents are allowed to deviate and assist in management of a child.. but where there are life threatening consequences.. hopefully we can make them wards of the state...
example 1
Parents that dun believe in immunisation.
there are times when its not too consequential atm such as smallpox and i can understand the reasoning.
there are times when id highly recommend it to parents.. like Flu vaccines.
there are times when id like to beat the parents over the head with a cast iron hammer like Hep B, Meningacoccal C, Rubella etc..
example 2
Jehovah's Witnesses' Children and their rights to life-saving blood transfusions.
...this is wayyyy too long of a discussion in itself...
if i wont cost life... be informed.. but ignorance is bliss sometimes and medical science is a stupid stupid field..
Interestingly one of the main factors in chronic back pain is psychological and stress manifesting itself as physical pain.. and mabbe a listening chiropractor is far better than a busy medical practitioner rushing to find a medical or surgical solution.... of course one is bound to make u more relaxed too..
and there are times when it is muscle spasms.. and the rubbing and trigger points help.. it helps me
.. my lower back pain just goes
altho where some chiropractors claim to adjust ure spine to cure asthma is a load of crock..
HotShot said:
when it comes medicine, it varies from person to person, and thus it maybe effective on one dude and ineffective on a another. anti-botics on some people have no effect does this mean it is a hoax? whilst others it has rapid effect.
The reason homepathy is preferred i believe is because its safe (lol cause of the dilution).
no... prolly cos the bacteria is resistant to that antibiotic.. get another one .. generally antibiotic courses need to be completed lik 5-7 days worth. even after symptoms have gone. GP's get reluctant to prescribe 'stronger' antibiotics cos they now get tracked and they have to self monitor to insure we dun get too many antibiotic resistant bacteria.
some Homeopaths overseas have used deadly nightshade.. as it was used traditionally..killed ppl.. prolly the natural cure for life
loquasagacious said:
Full body massage.....
The explanation for spinal abnormality having broader effects is that muscles are by their nature interconnecting so when some are strained eg in your back others are strained because they are connected.
Other ailments may be felt by the nervous system (but not actually occuring) because of pressure against the spinal cord.
Finally just as pressure against the spinal cord by misaligned vertebrae can impair signals 'up' the cord they could also impair signals 'down' the cord. eg send improper messages to various places.
I find the first two certainly plausible. I think of greater importance though is the backs central importance to movement etc. It is a key player in core strength so when it is aligned you feel better all over.
Pausible is one thing but you need to extrapolate the information to experimental data to prove the point.. in Chiropractics they need more work on this part of their science. I certainly feel they have a place in health care but whether to publicly fund it is dependent on their works' scientific basis..