christina88
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2004
- Messages
- 28
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2005
not just you.. seemingly everyone else who feels they need a scapegoat.
That is precisely what I mean, Cheltenham only used the English catholic paper, nothing else...so I don't know why our internally written exams affect the rest of the state.helper said:If they used the catholic papers for all eight, they have broken a legal contract that states you will do the paper on the day specified or later. As the CSSA said, it happens every year.
Sure Cheltenham should be told, we are no longer going to supply you with trials for breaking security arrangments. I'm interested why no-one is having a go at the tutors that also apparently were teaching from it.
I have no idea what you are trying to insinuate. Each to their own I suppose.haboozin said:Will you go out with me?
Again with the personal attacks. I don't see how personal attacks will make any difference. There is no need to personally attack and abuse individual girls. This is unfair and also hurtful. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions but there is no need to express them if they are aimed to hurt people.SSaint said:yesssss haha.. sam vs iemma
either way, both news reports highlight what we already know cheltenham sucks, and rofl at the girl who said "but we'll stand strongly together and get through this", do you feel your integrity has been compromised?? haha
u tell it like it is sista !brightsea said:and if the board only thinks it's an inconvinence and good practise, good for them. they can send a representative, preferably an ex-english teacher to sit my exam (if i have to redo it), because frankly i don't need the pressure/stress/anxiety/"practise" of another exam worth 30%.