thats mean and harsh to all the accounting studentsMasterPUA said:Not if I have my way. I like to propagate the saying "Once back office, always back office" :rofl:
thats mean and harsh to all the accounting studentsMasterPUA said:Not if I have my way. I like to propagate the saying "Once back office, always back office" :rofl:
wowwvelox said:Actually head of Lehman in Aus is a dr, and one of the execs is a vet. Not sure how current that is, but it was true at one stage.
Banking does not need specific skills, it has a generic skill set but needs dedicated and intelligent people.
khosanman said:Look Newbie, you are wrong again. I dont know if you work at a big 4 or not, maybe go and ask someone there in transfer pricing because you are giving people the wrong idea of what happens here, and be big enouhg to admit it.
Transfer pricing is not tax based at all really, they even told me this at deloitte, and said it sits under the international tax banner, but its not really like any tax work. It is not a science it is an art, it is about coming up with logical reasons and defences as to what and why the prices for the contribution should be.
And why then do most of the big 4s encourage all their transfer pricing staff to do CFA?? Must be areason there?
And what are you talking about structuring, the company already has a structure in place, that may be planned and worked out between the transfer pricing team and the international tax team, but once that is done the prices need to be set and defended.
All this setting and defending of prices is done with COMPARABLE TRANSACTIONS. This is a very important main part of the work of transfer pricing. So its about finding best fit comparables and then tweaking them depending on the circumstances. IE, maybe in the comparable the company that is selling is taking on a lot more risk, so this needs to be analysed then taken into account when setting the price. Make sense??
THere is also a fair bit of valuation done, most frequently with intangible transfer within companies and in M&A transactions.
Now tell me where did you learn about what transfer pricing is?
Now Im not saying its a finance job, because i never did i dont think, and i agree its not, but it is quite different to what you are having people believe.
Newbie said:i actually dont know why im helping you considering you are pretty stubborn. =/
but i believe this is good karma.
http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/article/0,1002,cid%253D56155,00.html
go read your own handbook before you start work. you should also put back the f1 key on your keyboard and read some tax law. CCH has a good version and EMs on their site too.
transfer pricing is all about compliance, documentation and review defense against the ATO. It is a tax job. If you refuse to believe that, thats fine. You will find out what it is about soon enough.
Ypu really are an arrog frustrating twat. I rang my work before to confirm what I will be doing and to discuss it, and they have confirmed and said what the job entails. I can now guarantee I am correct.Newbie said:you havent done a day of transfer pricing
which means my experience goes beyond yours. I've been there already. in a firm bigger than deloitte.
you fail to see that i have nothing to gain from telling you this information. You have nothing to lose by listening either.
2 months from now you will be back here asking for advice because you are stuck in a tax compliance job that really wasnt for you because you had some false impression of what it really was about.
Also further to reiterate without it just being word, here is what someone roteon yahoo answers about what an analyst does:khosanman said:Ypu really are an arrog frustrating twat. I rang my work before to confirm what I will be doing and to discuss it, and they have confirmed and said what the job entails. I can now guarantee I am correct.
You are one of those people who you just cant argue with I can tell, so good luck to you, you wont get much farther in life with your attitude.
Can you see the nerd rage?khosanman said:Ypu really are an arrog frustrating twat. I rang my work before to confirm what I will be doing and to discuss it, and they have confirmed and said what the job entails. I can now guarantee I am correct.
You are one of those people who you just cant argue with I can tell, so good luck to you, you wont get much farther in life with your attitude.
khosanman said:Also further to reiterate without it just being word, here is what someone roteon yahoo answers about what an analyst does:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AitzR37NU31vBIwaZiDRJN4jzKIX;_ylv=3?qid=20071120054928AAeOYo6
I just feel I need people to stop believing all the horse sh!t that comes from newbies fingers here, as people may actually think hes a bit of an authority on things round here because he posts so much.
You are right mate. I now what nerd rage is. Went in for a meet and greet this morning and intro to things, and they showed me what it is I will and they are doing. So all is good and I can be comfortable in the fact that I was correct, and think I am going to enjoy the job quite a lot.pete_mate said:haha woah, settle down there.
I think the problem here is different ways the job title "transfer pricing" is used between countries at the end of the day.
I don't think you need to get thing personal.
Newbie said:if you actually read what you write
you are just quoting what im saying
and as for twisting "documentation" into something more glamourous...nice try.
Please dont even try comparing the content of what we posted, i think people can see the difference between yahoo answers/seek.com and a textbook the firm you are joining authored. And the fact that you rely on those sources as information just means you certainly lack the common sense to research properly for the job you are applying for.
I posted what i did just to give you a headsup that your job might not be as cool as you think it is. if you cant take advice from someone who has been there thats fine.
also no need to get too personal, im sure your sex appeal exceeds mine now that you are in "transfer pricing at deloitte". you lucky thing
i think he was working at an ibkhosanman said:Pursuant to Regulation No. 42 of 24 January 2006 a transfer pricing documentation should include the following items:
1. Description of the business including the legal structure, organisational structure, turnover and EBIT for all affiliated companies for the past three years with which controlled transactions have been concluded, historical review, and industry review.
2. Description of the controlled transactions including any cost contribution arrangements.
3. A comparability analysis.
4. A description of the implementation of the transfer pricing method including any price adjustments made.
5. Copies of written agreements.
---------------------------------------------------------------7
There that has the guidelines in general to what most countries documentation requirements are. What do you think the bulk of the work is, its the comparability analysis! and then price adjustments etc.
There is no getting through your thick stubborn skull. Oh do tell us all knowing great and mighty Newbie, what firm do you work for? In audit at a big 4 I suspect and think you know all?
On a side note for all, Documentation requirement no1 sounds great as you get to learn a lot about the company and the industry with the description and analysis required.
khosanman said:Dude what do yohink documentation is. It is exactly what I said. Get a clue. I just told you I spoke with my transfer pricing unit on wha they do and what i said is correct, so how could it be wrong. How could you possibly be right and not them?