ridiculous that the judges made the decision based on her not being able to show who else put the drugs in her bag if not her
what kind of logic is that, surely if you were tried for murder you wouldn't have to show who was the actual murderer in order to prove your innocence
it's absurd to think a person who doesnt take drugs, going on a holiday to visit a relative, has never had problems with the law or anything like that would decide to stick 4 kg of marijuana in an unlocked bag to sell for a lower price than it would be in sydney
and considering they have evidence of corrupt customs officials, and that they just busted a racket that had been operating ON THE SAME DAY that her flight took off just lends weight to the argument that someone planted the drugs in her bag which were meant to be collected in sydney
and now just because she happened to be on a certain flight on a certain day and couldn't show how the drugs got into her bag or have the bag tested for fingerprints etc she gets to spend 20 years of her life in prison. she basically loses her chances to get married, have children etc because of bad luck