TaEkWoNdObArBiE
Mmmm....kinky
WOW...now I'm going to read it...jhakka said:It was a Stephen King one.
WOW...now I'm going to read it...jhakka said:It was a Stephen King one.
The movie version if often different from the book.happy cup said:Harry Potter? The Notebook? A Walk to remember? Lord of the Rings? etc etc. Is the movie version usually better than the book?
The notebook novel was diff to the movie. but i still <3 it.Emma-Jayde said:I like the books better. At least out of every movie that I've seen and read the book.
It's especially worse when they make the movie AFTER you've read the book. They cut so much out and put so much crap into movies that it just gives me the shits.
Especially LotR. Look at what they did to it! That was sacrilige!
amen, i try and do the same. though bridget jones 2 was the one adaptation that i couldn't relax and go with, but that's more to do with issues of them remaking the first film, rather than filming the book. But generally, yep, i'm with you, see them as different texts and it'll be much less distressing!Mr_Shrimp said:books and film are two totally different mediums that really can't be compared so simply. Of course they have to cut things from books for the movies, they are movies, not accurate representations. Books are aimed at a somewhat different audience than many films. I'd say that there are some great 'book to movie' films but they will never be the same as the books, it's impossible. You just have to go and watch the movie, forgetting you've read the book. Forget all the characters and the story and let the movie make it's own characters and plot . you'll enjoy the movie much more if you arent constantly saying "hey, that's not what happened! first they went to xxx and did yyy, THEN they went there and did zzz".......
I'll keep that in mind.Argonaut said:just don't tell them I sent you and be careful of the Mods.
ahh yes they suck majorlykeladry said:the worst ever adaption of a book into a movie was definitely Queen of the Damned - they completely butchered it *still pissed after 4 years* i hope disney doesn't do the same for narnia... although they do have a rep for doing crappy adaptions...
EDIT: forgot to say that lotr, the notebook and walk to remember movies were pretty good as stand-alones - just not if u've read the books (well the notebook book could've been better =P)
Yeah, the movie was based off Andrew Lloyd Webber's musical, not the book.alphatango said:The only example I can think of where movie > book: The Phantom of the Opera.
Perhaps the untranslated French version is better. But then, I can't read that. I guess it's a little unfair to use PotO as an example though, given that it's more based on the musical than the book.
You need to watch more movies.alphatango said:The only example I can think of where movie > book: The Phantom of the Opera.