wrong_turn
the chosen one
but that would mean that a statute would have had to be made since the stature overides the precedent ?? what the hell?? so that means i wont be able to get my raw marks back? stupid government!
Yepzies remember wrong turn wat did you learn in legal studies when there is a clash between common and statute law, statute law prevails, also that the government at anytime can make a law that overrides a precedent as long as its not unconstitutionalwrong_turn said:but that would mean that a statute would have had to be made since the stature overides the precedent ?? what the hell?? so that means i wont be able to get my raw marks back? stupid government!
melsc i was just stating my disbelief or merely questioning the illogical truth that it seems i just cant believe that the parliament would amend or create an act for this?! if they have they are shonks!!melsc said:Yepzies remember wrong turn wat did you learn in legal studies when there is a clash between common and statute law, statute law prevails, also that the government at anytime can make a law that overrides a precedent as long as its not unconstitutional
They have too much time on their hands ...lol u know me I jump at any excuse to spout legal stuffwrong_turn said:melsc i was just stating my disbelief or merely questioning the illogical truth that it seems i just cant believe that the parliament would amend or create an act for this?! if they have they are shonks!!
Could someone take it to the AAT if they really wanted?Lazarus said:There is no statute or legislation that prevents you gaining access to your own marks.
There isn't even a common law decision yet - nothing has been decided by the courts.
All that has happened is that the Board has made an administrative decision which has not yet been challenged.
What, in this instance, would be involved in a review by the NSW ADT?Lazarus said:The appropriate action would be to seek a review of the decision in the NSW ADT (the State equivalent of the Cwlth AAT).
So, yes, it can be done, by someone with proper standing.
I have to admit that that was one of the most random posts I have ever seen on BoSSashatheMan said:HSC over for me, i dotn came any more how they scaled me. all i care now is for it to get Harder so others can suffer mahaha
Any citizen has the right to make an application under the Freedom of Information Act.Danni07 said:So, will we (the 2005ers) have the chance to fill out this form and request our raw marks? Is there any hope that we will receive them?
If someone requested all raw band cut-offs and made them public, no-one would really need to make an application as an accurate estimation (rounding would still cause problems) for the raw marks could be deduced from the cut-offs.Lazarus said:I agree with Captain pi.
The legal costs would (roughly) be:
$30 initial application fee (BOS)
$40 internal review fee (BOS)
$55 external review fee (ADT)
= $125
But once that was done, if successful, any student would be able to obtain their marks with just the initial fee of $30.
[comment]I'll speak to you in November. [/comment]Lazarus said:There might be a few more costs incurred in a matter like that... raw band cut-offs are (or seem to be?) slightly more controversial, which means the Board would be more likely to appeal an adverse decision made by the Tribunal.
Though I suppose the actual cost of the appeal would fall to them. Mainly just additional costs in terms of time and preparation etc.
[comment]Very clever. [/comment]Captain pi said:Any citizen has the right to make an application under the Freedom of Information Act.