Bio Predications (1 Viewer)

[tvskAXatar]

might have lost a mark for repetition of similar points for ethical implications, idk if 'GM' crops is too vague for the question or not since GM is a really broad term (obviously it's a biotech but they might have beef with it if u didn't state it was transgenic or something, not sure tho), but its rlly subjective and dependent on marking obviously

I did state recombinant DNA for Bt corn/cotton and explained the process in regards to GM crops. So 4/7?

 

[CrimsonStrider]

wait Q8 the one about the tsetse fly was direct contact right?? it was biting...

omg its giving cancelled.... what an idiot... (jane approved post)

 

[literallydomfike]

omg its giving cancelled.... what an idiot... (jane approved post)

please i spewed and spasmed for a sec and then i realised

 

[pancake15]

I did state recombinant DNA for Bt corn/cotton and explained the process in regards to GM crops. So 4/7?

4-5/7 prolly, personally I'd say 4 is a bit of a low ball considering u have around 2 impacts for each + ethics as well as named examples

 

[tvskAXatar]

Fuck I'm so screwed if 88 is actually the state median.

 

[shoulfer]

Fuck I'm so screwed if 88 is actually the state median.

they will just make the marking criteria stricter and stricter on short answer questions until they get a good distribution very low chance state median is 88 because the distribution wouldn't be proper for top end.

 

[femboys4life]

i do think there will be a couple questions. at least a couple 2-3 markers though not 100% sure. maybe 20 marks worth of multis too im guessing. i think overall there will be a grand total of 100 marks available, although this is just my guess

 

[femboys4life]

4 longer tik toks for the mc with explanations this time. she talks pretty fast but these are better than the original tik tok

https://www.tiktok.com/@ayabarghachoun/video/7432279053782093077

https://www.tiktok.com/@ayabarghachoun/video/7432299321514560788

https://www.tiktok.com/@ayabarghachoun/video/7432304042551921938

https://www.tiktok.com/@ayabarghachoun/video/7432304784448703762

thanks man

 

[e8zks]

Fuck based on those solutions I scored 16. Not good considering the whole of NSW said it was super easy...

lol I got 10 more than I got in trials woo hoo

 

[e8zks]

might have lost a mark for repetition of similar points for ethical implications, idk if 'GM' crops is too vague for the question or not since GM is a really broad term (obviously it's a biotech but they might have beef with it if u didn't state it was transgenic or something, not sure tho), but its rlly subjective and dependent on marking obviously

I did gm in agriculture and crispr

 

[shushhhhhhhhh]

4 longer tik toks for the mc with explanations this time. she talks pretty fast but these are better than the original tik tok

https://www.tiktok.com/@ayabarghachoun/video/7432279053782093077

https://www.tiktok.com/@ayabarghachoun/video/7432299321514560788

https://www.tiktok.com/@ayabarghachoun/video/7432304042551921938

https://www.tiktok.com/@ayabarghachoun/video/7432304784448703762

i also attached them here as zipped mp4s

bro is pushing 40 and on bos, bouta catch a case

 

[tvskAXatar]

Fuck I feel like 85 raw is going to be really bad when it comes to alignment….could 85 raw even go backwards to 84 in scaling

 

[Timsaay]

bro someone draw a punnet square for q20, I swear B works as well

 

[sdvfgsererew]

bro someone draw a punnet square for q20, I swear B works as well

nah bro, i’m sure it’s explained in those videos which were posted, but it’s definitely C because of how sex-linked traits work. for the 4th pedigree, neither parent is showing the trait but it is passed down to 3/4 sons and no daughters. This means it is sex-linked recessive, as the daughters are able to block the sex-linked recessive with the other X chromosome, whilst males cannot as they are XY.

 

[sdvfgsererew]

Fuck I feel like 85 raw is going to be really bad when it comes to alignment….could 85 raw even go backwards to 84 in scaling

This pretty much can’t happen, they will just continue to revise their marking criteria until they get around a median they like. The break-even will still be like 75

 

[tvskAXatar]

This pretty much can’t happen, they will just continue to revise their marking criteria until they get around a median they like. The break-even will still be like 75

So scaling to be similar to 2023?

 

[sdvfgsererew]

So scaling to be similar to 2023?

Yeah i’d say probably, but marking will be harsher, so a response for a 5 marker which may have gotten you full marks last year will only get you 4/5 if that makes sense. Our short answer questions were a lot easier.

 

[twilight_star24]

I think i overthought a lot of the questions tbhhh I was preparing for a much more difficult exam and focused on harder questions and weirdly neglected the really easy stuff which makes no sense but idk

thank goodness though I do 12 units worst case scenario bio doesn't even count

 

[shushhhhhhhhh]

I think i overthought a lot of the questions tbhhh I was preparing for a much more difficult exam and focused on harder questions and weirdly neglected the really easy stuff which makes no sense but idk

thank goodness though I do 12 units worst case scenario bio doesn't even count

damn

 

[shoulfer]

GUYS DID U HAVE TO REMOVE THE OUTLIER IN THE GRAPHING QUESTION

there wasn't an outlier mate