Band 6 cut off?? (1 Viewer)

[tacogym27101990]

What do you all think the band 6 cut off will be?
/100

 

[iEdd]

Judging by doing the past papers. In 2001 it was 78. This paper was slightly easier if I can remember 2001's. Probably about 80, maybe 85.

 

[syriangabsta]

Judging by doing the past papers. In 2001 it was 78. This paper was slightly easier if I can remember 2001's. Probably about 80, maybe 85.

slightly easier? from who's perspective?i dont think you know how the state did within 1.5 hours after the exam has been completed..and 85 seems abit too high.

 

[iEdd]

My perspective obviously. Then again I would've gotten better at physics since doing that past paper. I still stand by about 80 as a guess.

 

[syriangabsta]

I see, what do u think the cut off for a 76+ will be, possibly even band 5.

 

[Aaron.Judd]

I too would have to say about 85.

 

[Arithela]

cut-off will be 80/100

 

[proringz]

Physics isn't a low scaling subject. It wouldn't be 85. From past years, it will probably be 70-80, towards the higher end.

 

[addikaye03]

what do u guys think a 95/100 raw will equate to?

and to keep it on topic i would say low 80 will be band 6

 

[cheney31]

what do u guys think a 95/100 raw will equate to?

something really awsome..LOL

 

[Lanser7]

i thought band 6 was always 90+

 

[addikaye03]

something really awsome..LOL

Really? i am so happy right now lol how perfect were the two 6 markers, i was predicting the question b4the exam and got the photoelectriv effect/SR one lol Does anyone do Quanta to Quarks? that was so awesome, very straight forward ( i wrote about Bohr and de Broglie)

 

[addikaye03]

i thought band 6 was always 90+

thats HSC mark, ie, the mark you get after they allign it, moderate and do all these wonderful things to it. RAW is what u think u got /100 in the exam.

 

[snowconesyum]

a friend of mine did it a few years ago, was pretty sure they got 85% and that became 93..

 

[Mr.Roguey]

Really? i am so happy right now lol how perfect were the two 6 markers, i was predicting the question b4the exam and got the photoelectriv effect/SR one lol Does anyone do Quanta to Quarks? that was so awesome, very straight forward ( i wrote about Bohr and de Broglie)

The Quanta to Quarks questions were really good, i did Heisenberg and Pauli

I think the cut-off would be low 80s

 

[timmiitippii]

seeing how it compared to past papers, not that much harder or easier .. i can[t tell atm but possibly 81 alligns to a 90 ?

 

[I'M-CHEN]

i think my raw mark will be 75-80, what will that scal to?

is that possible 85?

 

[addikaye03]

The Quanta to Quarks questions were really good, i did Heisenberg and Pauli

I think the cut-off would be low 80s

Yer thats a good one, my friend done chadwick and fermi. Wot mark u think u get?

and dux last year got 89-90 raw and he got 96

 

[syriangabsta]

Yer thats a good one, my friend done chadwick and fermi. Wot mark u think u get?

and dux last year got 89-90 raw and he got 96

how does he know his raw mark..

do we get given our raw marks each year?!? or was it only 2001 and a few others like i thought..:S

 

[I-Love-Jesus]

I'm not going to vote in the poll because I think it will be somewhere in the 79-81/100 range.
It was nice, but there were some things I just had to make up. Like, in Q2Q, I totally made up my answer to the Standard Model question! I will probably get 1, maybe 2 out of 4. Probably lost like 6 marks in that section =/
How about question 16? I opened the paper to the short answer questions and just laughed. I had no idea!
Anyway, I hoping for band 6.

Waaaaaaaaaay too few calculation questions, especially projectiles! A single multiple choice question? =[