OMG arghhh i made a silly mistake, accidentally did (1/2)x51x28=714... thanks anyway. so they expect you to know all those pythagorean triads in the AMC or what?I got 728.
Solution attached.
He said junior paper? Arent some of the last questions different?18. D
26. 972
27. 728
not sure about 30, would be interested to see a solution.
ohhhhhh LOL oops my bad...He said junior paper? Arent some of the last questions different?
No.so they expect you to know all those pythagorean triads in the AMC or what?
For 26, 27 and 30 I get 512, 162 and 765 respectivelyHi, does anyone know the answer for Questions 18, 26, 27 and 30 in the Junior Paper? It would be really appreciated if you could provide those. Thanks a lot!
Could you please show how to get it?Thanks for 28 and 29, I assume the answers are 495 and 506 respectively?
I agree with both Q28: 495 and Q29: 506.Could you please show how to get it?
A slight miscalculation I think... make that 161 for Q27For 26, 27 and 30 I get 512, 162 and 765 respectively
Looks good.Hope this actually makes sense, solution to question 22:
Yep, I know the bolded.Looks good.
Here's another variation: Since the line divides the shaded area in half (this is only true because it also divides the whole rectangle in half, by the way), it must past through the midpoint of the line connecting the circles' centres. If we take P as (0,0) and C as (6,2), this midpoint is (2.5, 1). Then the gradient and y-intercept of the line can easily be shown to be both 2/7, pretty much as you did before.
Another way to get this gradient is to imagine 'sliding' the right hand circle up the line like a bead along a wire, to sit in the top right hand corner of the rectangle, with new centre (11,3) - this gives the same sort of nice symmetrical picture you used to choose XP = 1.
972 is correct, and a nice way to picture things is with a trellis showing possible scores and the numbers of ways of reaching them. Apologies for the crappy image, but since you already have the working I think you can get the picture - the numbers are added like in Pascal's triangle:Consider the scores are equal at (x,x), then you have two possibilities (x+1,x) or (x,x+1).
If the scores are unequal at (x,x+1) you also have two possibilities (x+1,x+1) or (x,x+2).
However if the scores are 2 apart (x,x+2) you only have one possibility (x+1,x+2).
Start at (0,0) and apply this, you find the pattern is double then add half of what you have, i.e.:
1) 2
2) 4
3) 6
4) 12
5) 18
6) 36
7) 54
8) 108
9) 162
10) 324
11) 486
12) 972
I might add I don't know for sure if my answers are correct, I'm just posting my personal working out.
I've just hit on the short and neat way of doing this QConsider the scores are equal at (x,x), then you have two possibilities (x+1,x) or (x,x+1).
If the scores are unequal at (x,x+1) you also have two possibilities (x+1,x+1) or (x,x+2).
However if the scores are 2 apart (x,x+2) you only have one possibility (x+1,x+2).
Start at (0,0) and apply this, you find the pattern is double then add half of what you have, i.e.:
1) 2
2) 4
3) 6
4) 12
5) 18
6) 36
7) 54
8) 108
9) 162
10) 324
11) 486
12) 972
I might add I don't know for sure if my answers are correct, I'm just posting my personal working out.
It's the holidays so hopefully I'll receive it early next term O:So the results are out, how did you guys do?