• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

AMC Questions (1 Viewer)

Iruka

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
544
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
O.K, you made a little triangle that is right angled. it has hypotenuse 5 metres and one leg 4 metres, so we can figure out that the other leg is 3 metres. I assumed that the road is a constant 4 metre width (which seems reasonable to me).

...This question would be much easier to explain if some of the vertices were labelled with letters...

However, since the two sides of the road are parrallel to each other, the angle that the upper side of the road makes with the left hand side of the paddock is the same as the angle that the lower side of the road makes with the left hand side of the paddock. I figured out what the tan of this angle is from the 3-4-5 triangle and then apply it to the larger triangle (i.e, the lower corner of the paddock) to find the width.
 

kurt.physics

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
840
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
conics2008 said:
lol this is what i got but the dodgy style lol... xD..... what is the right answer Kurt ?
I dont have it, the paper didnt come with solutions, that why i posted it up on the forum hoping someone could give the answer
 

kurt.physics

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
840
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Iruka said:
O.K, you made a little triangle that is right angled. it has hypotenuse 5 metres and one leg 4 metres, so we can figure out that the other leg is 3 metres. I assumed that the road is a constant 4 metre width (which seems reasonable to me).

...This question would be much easier to explain if some of the vertices were labelled with letters...

However, since the two sides of the road are parrallel to each other, the angle that the upper side of the road makes with the left hand side of the paddock is the same as the angle that the lower side of the road makes with the left hand side of the paddock. I figured out what the tan of this angle is from the 3-4-5 triangle and then apply it to the larger triangle (i.e, the lower corner of the paddock) to find the width.
Did you deduce that the two were similar, if so, how?
 

undalay

Active Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
1,002
Location
Ashfield
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Refer to diagram.
a b c are angles

b = 180 - (90 + a)
b = 90 - a

c = 180 - (90+b)
c = 180 - (180 - a)
c = a

thus big triangle similar to small triangle.
Using ratio of sides

We work out width is 32m

Pythagoras, hypotenus is 40m

40x 4 = 160
 

Iruka

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
544
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
kurt.physics said:
Did you deduce that the two were similar, if so, how?

Both right angled triangles, with one other angle the same (see my reasoning above - properties of transversals falling on parallel lines) hence they are similar.

If you draw the little triangle on the left hand side of the picture, you might see what I mean more easily
 
Last edited:

kurt.physics

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
840
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
undalay said:
Refer to diagram.
a b c are angles

b = 180 - (90 + a)
b = 90 - a

c = 180 - (90+b)
c = 180 - (180 - a)
c = a

thus big triangle similar to small triangle.
Using ratio of sides

We work out width is 32m

Pythagoras, hypotenus is 40m

40x 4 = 160
Thanks alot!
 

conics2008

Active Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
1,228
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Iruka said:
O.K, you made a little triangle that is right angled. it has hypotenuse 5 metres and one leg 4 metres, so we can figure out that the other leg is 3 metres. I assumed that the road is a constant 4 metre width (which seems reasonable to me).

...This question would be much easier to explain if some of the vertices were labelled with letters...

However, since the two sides of the road are parrallel to each other, the angle that the upper side of the road makes with the left hand side of the paddock is the same as the angle that the lower side of the road makes with the left hand side of the paddock. I figured out what the tan of this angle is from the 3-4-5 triangle and then apply it to the larger triangle (i.e, the lower corner of the paddock) to find the width.

yes you sound good to me, you got my vote =) God bless you =) well donee.... it would help with that little triangle.. the angel is tan 3/4 then 90 - tan^-1 3/4 = 3/4 .... soo the angel at the bottom is 3/4

there fore widith is = to 3/4 = 24 /x do the maths solve for x you get x = 32 well done =)
 

conics2008

Active Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
1,228
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
^^ how about a long break.. say about forever... i solved my rubics cube like 10 times while trying to solve this question lol..
 

Iruka

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
544
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
You don't need to find any angles other than what's given.
 

undalay

Active Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
1,002
Location
Ashfield
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
ohmyyy.... curved corners!

I'll also guess that the circle fragments add up to one full circle.
so +4pi
the sides still add up to 125


So A?
Am i close

edit: yer im pretty sure its 125 + 4pi
 
Last edited:

Iruka

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
544
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
OK, we can add up the straight part of the guards path (when he is walking parrallel to the sides of the quadrilateral) and we get 18+18+40+45. Now we only have to figure out what happens at the corners R, P and Q. If the guard is to stay exactly 2 metres away from the corners, he must walk in a circular arc of radius 2 metres. So all we have to do is figure out how many degrees of rotation he must swing through, altogether.

Now, if he started somewhere along the side PS and is walking clockwise around the quadrilateral, we should count turns in the clockwise direction as positive, and those in the anti clockwise direction as negative. In total, he must swing through 360 degrees to end up where he started facing in the same direction, however, at S he does an anticlockwise turn of 90 degrees - so figure it out from there - he must travel the equivalent of 450 degrees in the clockwise direction around the other three corners.
 

undalay

Active Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
1,002
Location
Ashfield
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Iruka said:
OK, we can add up the straight part of the guards path (when he is walking parrallel to the sides of the quadrilateral) and we get 18+18+40+45. Now we only have to figure out what happens at the corners R, P and Q. If the guard is to stay exactly 2 metres away from the corners, he must walk in a circular arc of radius 2 metres. So all we have to do is figure out how many degrees of rotation he must swing through, altogether.

Now, if he started somewhere along the side PS and is walking clockwise around the quadrilateral, we should count turns in the clockwise direction as positive, and those in the anti clockwise direction as negative. In total, he must swing through 360 degrees to end up where he started facing in the same direction, however, at S he does an anticlockwise turn of 90 degrees - so figure it out from there - he must travel the equivalent of 450 degrees in the clockwise direction around the other three corners.
ah yes i used my own diagram which didn't go in ahaha.
But yeah makes sense for the diagram kurt gave. thx iruka

edit: btw how do u do Q10 efficiently: http://www.amt.canberra.edu.au/wuamcqs04.pdf
 
Last edited:

Iruka

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
544
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
The second circle will be tangent to both the first circle and the right hand side of the rectangle (somewhere). Let r be the radius of the second circle

Drop perpendiculars from the centres of the two circles to the base of the rectangle. Let x be the distance between these two perpendiculars. (Clearly 2+x +r = 6, so x = 4-r).

Now if you draw a line through the centres of the two circles, it will also pass through the point of tangency. (So you will have a trapezium ).

One of the parallel sides of the trapezium has length 2, the other has length r. of the two non-parallel sides, one has length x and the other has length 2+r.

Now we can use pythagoras theorem to show that
x^2 = (r+2)^2 - (r-2)^2,

But we have another expression for x in terms of r which we can substitute for x to obtain a quadratic in r.

You can then solve this to get the answer.
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
722
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
kurt.physics - and edited by buchanan said:
I got these from the year 9 & 10 Intermediate Division Competition Paper from the AMC 2002 - questions 24 and 27. I posted it up on the forum hoping someone could give the answer.

1. Farmer Taylor of Burra Creek is very annoyed. A 4m wide road has been put through one of his rectangular paddocks, splitting it into two. As a result, he has lost some of his land.



If all dimensions in the figure are in metres, how much land, in square metres, has he lost?

(A) 120 (B) 150 (C) 160 (D) 200 (E) 250

2. The walls of a castle form a quadrilateral PQRS as shown so that PQ = 40 m, QR = 45 m, RS = 20 m, SP = 20 m and ∠PSR = 90°.



A guard must walk outside the walls so that he is always 2 m from the nearest part of the walls. The guard started walking around the castle clockwise and finally arrived at the starting point. The length, in metres, of his walk was

(A) 125+4π (B) 121+5π (C) 125+5π (D) 121+6π (E) 125+6π
Official answers: 1. C 2. B

Official solutions attached.
 
Last edited:

kurt.physics

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
840
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
buchanan said:
Official answers: 1. C 2. B

Official solutions attached.
Hey, where did you get these? could you please post up the answers to the last 10 questions in the 2002 AMC? Preferably with worked solutions?
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top