white lady
No Motivation Whatsoever
Love AOE and AOE2. Always have and always will. It makes thinks plus it's my way of relaxing (destroying multple empires just to take my anger and frustration out).
then you dont play on zone.com . playing against the computer is very easy. with deathmatch i can rush in under 10 mins and win. and on random u just have to beat the first wave of troops and then its easy.PoP 'n' Fresh said:I love AoE 2: conq. One of the best games out there IMO.
Never lost a game is my record hehe.
yeh i even made a thread about it. amazing visualsFor all those interested, Age of Empires 3: Age of Kings (I think it was called) is coming out next year. theres some screenies out there for it.... looks alright, but will be hard to compete vs. conquerors.
i enjoyed AOM. i dotn know why everyone doesnt like it. i like the way the graphics looked.AoM was just shit. Bad gameplay.
i either play Random Civ, or if its Random then Huns. if its Deathmatch then probably Franks.What race did/do you guys play with?
And anyone up for a game after the hsc? =p
first strategy game i played was Warcraft.amoz_lilo said:OMG I loved age of empires! it was my first game that involved killing things...least i think it did...cant remember...so long ago...back in year 7 and then I converted to the Sims! vacation, hot date etc. what a waste of money! Over that now..
PoP 'n' Fresh said:My record stands for online play. Never lost a game on Zone.
10mins for a feudal rush... hmm thats sorta good I'll say... though I have other strats that easily wipe that out.
Woah... your talking about a deathmatch
Nah I never play those. they are...cheap.
Goths all the way!
huns are considered one of the best civs for Random games, cuase of the no houses.PoP 'n' Fresh said:thats why you lost every game =p
yeh i only understoofd the basic triggersking_of_boredom said:AOE2 + conquerors expansion rules. i remember back in the day creating my own maps trying to create helms deep, argh i could never figure out the conditions/triggers/actions. but i rememer playing that for sooooo long.
AOM + titans was also awesome. but i can't get the thing working on my computer again!!!
yeh britons have great archers , how ever their seige lacks the upgrades and is not the best help. however if u have enough archers nothing really stops them , cuase they shoot so far, by the time enemies come close to get u , they are dead.Argonaut said:I was usually the Britons - standard argo tactics include a layer of fire from my archers while my cavalry met the enemy head-on and the Britons had the best archery and cavalry upgrades. Of course, by the time you realised my seige engines were in the unofficial back door (ie: I made it), more cavalry and archers were spilling through your town.
My brother used to get so pissed off whenever I did that in a LAN game. He once even went so far as to build six rings of fortified walls around his base in an Arena map and lock all the gates. So I just cut through the trees and went in that way.
It is helpful especially whenever you forget to build some houses.... but every time I played crash (my bro) he lost.SashatheMan said:huns are considered one of the best civs for Random games, cuase of the no houses.
PoP 'n' Fresh said:It is helpful especially whenever you forget to build some houses.... but every time I played crash (my bro) he lost.
Also... huns don't get much else... I prefer goths still.
and to kill britons: feudal rushing!!