To be honest, I'm inclined to say that this wasn't an illegal act, although I'am by no means certain. You are correct in that you contributed to the business and did the training as an unpaid work trial, however the key is that it was optional. The emphasis on these laws is that it is illegal if the employer requires some period of unpaid work trials; that is, a period which is compulsory. In your case, this unpaid period wasn't compulsory. You had a choice not to engage in your employer's offer. That's my opinion based on the semantics of the law. But on an overall sense, one can argue that it is essentially compulsory to engage in these training sessions; otherwise how could one successfully perform to standards at the job? But like I said, I'm leaning towards OK for this one.hApPy1 said:So this is very interesting- my boss just told me on my first official shift that my "training session" was optional hour-wise (and i do remember this) but that my four hours in this fast-food joint would not be paid for on account of this being optional.
i did in fact contribute to the sales of teh business since i stood at the register taking orders, prepared a bit of food and cleaned up teh store a fair bit. I was quite shocked to find him say that "we here do not pay for training our staff but rather they come in for as much as they need to get a feel of the place and get a free meal", i should mention at this point that he asked me "would u like a free chicken" when i said i didnt want one he insisted- so i took it :/
ps. i dont want no friggen chicken- i want the money i worked for... what the hell is going on? i am prepared to do something- but what? do i even have a right to get paid for this so-called "training"?
any advise would be greatly appreciated...thanx peeps