This is spot on. You can't put a price on hard work and consistency that is built when working towards an ATAR. IMO, that is the entire point of implementing the ATAR system. It is so you develop a consisten study pattern that can be implemented in universityNothing is better than earning something through hardwork. And that's something the HSC does teach you-even if the syllabi aren't that useful for university study in many cases.
It's isn't that ATAR on paper that determines anything, it's how you decide to work that number and apply yourself academically in university that is more important.
Meanwhile...in Economics.You can't put a price on hard work and consistency
Applying the cost-benefit principle, should I be willing to pay $20000 for an ATAR of 99.95, or stick with 99.70, and not pay anything at all?99.95 is worth a lot more than $20,000. Firstly, you get a 10k/year scholarship so for a five year course, you have $50k there. Then also from a tutoring perspective, it is very easy to get students- hence more money here and also indirectly with a higher ATAR, you can do whatever course you want.
But also if one were to buy the ATAR who is to say they could maintain it as required at uni, most of those you need a D average every semester and it is only paid per semester.I think the question is more or less asking if you could buy an ATAR and skip the HSC, what would you pay for it. Personally, even though a 99.95 ATAR could be worth a fair bit of money scholarship wise, I think most people would be in trouble if they skipped from Year 11 to uni. As much as people bag the HSC for being nothing in comparison to uni, it still in a way prepares you in terms of skills and other intangibles which you need for uni. I would say if someone skipped year 12 to go directly to uni, they would most likely stuggle significantly during the first year.