• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

4u Mathematics Marathon V 1.0 (1 Viewer)

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
icycloud said:
Haha alright! Have fun with the question. The substitution is quite elegant.
Got a good substitution, reduces the problem to:

cos[t] = Sqrt[(b - a)/(b - x)]

Reduces the problem to integral of:
sec[t]tan[t]dt

Simple...
 
I

icycloud

Guest
KeypadSDM said:
Got a good substitution, reduces the problem to:

cos[t] = Sqrt[(b - a)/(b - x)]

Reduces the problem to integral of:
sec[t]tan[t]dt

Simple...
Umm nice? I had another substitution in mind though. Let's see the full working :).
 

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
icycloud said:
Umm nice? I had another substitution in mind though. Let's see the full working :).
Sigh... Here we go:

But now I can see the problem in a greater light. Treat Sqrt[b - x] as the hypotenuse, and Sqrt[x - a] as one of the other sides. Then use sin[t] = Sqrt[(b-a)/(b-x)] And it resolves nicely.

Honestly, can't be stuffed writing the solution I've got, but it's shorter than that other crap one.
 
I

icycloud

Guest
Yep my method is similar. If you're interested:
x = a Cos^2 + b Sin^2

I guess we need a new question now.
 

Templar

P vs NP
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Messages
1,979
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Got nice simple combination question, don't think it's ext 2 level though.
 
I

icycloud

Guest
Templar said:
Got nice simple combination question, don't think it's ext 2 level though.
Post it anyway? :D You can post two -- one which is ext-2 and the other one which isn't.
 

Templar

P vs NP
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Messages
1,979
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
The question runs on ext 2 combinatorics skills, and is really easy once you see it.

A compositionof an integer is when it is written as the sum of positive integers

n=x1+x2+...+xk, k>0 (ie 3 is a composition of 3)

Assuming that order does matter (ie 1+2 and 2+1 are different compositions of 3), how many compositions are there for integer n (need proper proof/argument instead of a number)?

You can have a crack at this one (and anyone else interested). Someone write a proper ext 2 question.
 
I

icycloud

Guest
Templar said:
The question runs on ext 2 combinatorics skills, and is really easy once you see it.

A compositionof an integer is when it is written as the sum of positive integers

n=x1+x2+...+xk, k>0 (ie 3 is a composition of 3)

Assuming that order does matter (ie 1+2 and 2+1 are different compositions of 3), how many compositions are there for integer n (need proper proof/argument instead of a number)?

You can have a crack at this one (and anyone else interested). Someone write a proper ext 2 question.
2^(n-1)? Do I need to prove it? <-- Oops just re-read your question. Working on proof now...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I

icycloud

Guest
Templar said:
If you know how it works, no. Otherwise I would like you to prove it.
Hmm I thought it was the n-th row of the Pascal Triangle. Sum (r=0 --> r=n) nCr ???
 

Templar

P vs NP
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Messages
1,979
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
icycloud said:
Hmm I thought it was the n-th row of the Pascal Triangle. Sum (r=0 --> r=n) nCr ???
Can you show why it is the nth row of the Pascal's triangle? Just making sure you didn't get it by just writing some composition out and looking at a pattern.

And there is a slightly quicker way without using Pascal's.

OK someone post an ext 2 question for tomorrow.
 
Last edited:
I

icycloud

Guest
Templar said:
Can you show why it is the nth row of the Pascal's triangle? Just making sure you didn't get it by just writing some composition out and looking at a pattern.

And there is a slightly quicker way without using Pascal's.

OK someone post an ext 2 question for tomorrow.
Hehe alright. Still working on it.........
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Wow this maths is really getting interesting. Although i barely had much idea with the integral that icycloud posted this morning.
 

Templar

P vs NP
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Messages
1,979
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
An actual ext 2 question based on similar principle from one of the High papers in 2004 (if I remembered the question exactly).

There are 9 rings and 4 fingers. How many ways are there to wear the rings if order on each finger matters and

a. each finger must have at least one ring
b. a finger can have no rings

Keep in factorial/bionomial form.
 

SeDaTeD

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2004
Messages
571
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Haha, that composition one is really easy. Templar would know what my solution is anyway.

For the fingers and rings.
part a) 9!*8C3
part b) 9!*13C4 Edit: wait, make that 9!*12C3

I'll omit the working out cos i guess Tmeplar would like someone to figure it out.
 
Last edited:
I

icycloud

Guest
OK, I got a "proof" for the "non ext-2 question"...
For integer n, imagine n boxes, and n-1 separators.
With no separators, obviously there's one way of getting a row of length n. (i.e. 1 + 1 + 1 + ... = n) [(n-1)C0]
With one separator, there are n-1 slots, thus n-1 combinations. [(n-1)C1]
With two separators, there are (n-1)C2 combinations.
...
With n-1 separators, there are (n-1)C(n-1) combinations.

Thus the total number of combinations is:

Sum (r=0 to r=n-1) .. (n-1) C r = 2^(n-1)

OK now what's the proper proof? :D
 

SeDaTeD

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2004
Messages
571
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Or you could say, for each gap between the boxes, separator or no separator.
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Damn i havent done perms and combs yet, this is a completely different dialect for me lol. :D
 

Templar

P vs NP
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Messages
1,979
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
I was going to leave a note saying you shouldn't spoil the fun with the official solution, but I thought the probability of that happening is low enough not to warrant it.

This reminds me of another question in the same program on L trominos and tiling, solving with induction. It was also taught in first year discrete (which I never turned up) and later appeared in the exam. Later on it was interesting to see all the variations on the methods used to solve it after having done it myself during the exam.
 

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Templar said:
An actual ext 2 question based on similar principle from one of the High papers in 2004 (if I remembered the question exactly).

There are 9 rings and 4 fingers. How many ways are there to wear the rings if order on each finger matters and

a. each finger must have at least one ring
b. a finger can have no rings

Keep in factorial/bionomial form.
For a) just use the divider locations. You've got 9 rings and 3 dividers, with 8 locations for the divider to go in. Since the order of the rings matters, multiply by 9!, hence 9! * 8C3

For b) I was considering doing it by summation, but that seems too long for a simple answer.

Oh wait, now I remember, add in 4 generic rings and add them to each finger, thus the problem degenerates into the first one with 13 rings with only 9 being unique. Hence 13*12*11*...5*12C4 = (13!/4!)*(12C4).
I dunno if that's right, but whatever.
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Could one of you post up a new question please?

Thanks. ;)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top