• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

3u Mathematics Marathon V 1.1 (1 Viewer)

Smiley :D CvH

New Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
Messages
16
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
pLuvia said:
What does the w.r.t.x actually mean? Make x the subject?

∫[-1 to 5] (x2 - 9) dx
= [x3/3 - 9x] [-1 to 5]
= 12

i dunno gt da answer = -12 are u referin 2 da da number on the bottom of the integral symbol being -1 and the top being 5?
or ish it the other way around, bt if it is sorrii my mistake
 

Pianpupodoel

Neurotic Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
73
Location
3. The answer's always 3.
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Mountain.Dew said:
okay, now to continue the grand marathon:

this was posted in the 2U maths marathon thread, but it was deemed too hard for 2U, so instead, it is here:

Question: I am in a poker game, and I am dealt 5 cards from an ordinary 52-card deck. What is the PROBABILITY (hehehe i know people have P'lty) that I will get:
(i) one pair
(ii) a two pair
(iii) a triple
(iv) a straight
(v) a flush
(vi) a full house
(vii) a four-of-a-kind
(viii) a royal flush?
(ix) high card? (ie no poker combinations...i leave this till last cos i think this is the hardest one...)
Seeing as though no one else seems to want to try the question, the answers, as well as good mathematical explanations behind them, can be found here:
http://www.math.sfu.ca/~alspach/comp18/

Continuing the probability and counting theme, this question is taken from the Y12 3U Cambridge textbook.
There are ten basketballers in a team. Find how many ways they can be split into two teams of five.
 
I

icycloud

Guest
Pianpupodoel said:
There are ten basketballers in a team. Find how many ways they can be split into two teams of five.
10C5 / 2

Explanation:

Let the two teams be X and Y.
First, choose five players for X -- there are 10C5 ways to do this (the rest goes to team Y).
However, we could have chosen Y first, and then X, so we double-counted and must divide 10C5 by 2.

Next Question:
Change of themes here :). Find ∫dx/( sqrt(x) * (1+x)).
 
I

icycloud

Guest
KeypadSDM said:
Fairly easy integration question:

∫dx/(1 + e-x)
Might as well do this as well :).

I = ∫dx/(1 + e^-x)

u = e^x, du/u = dx

I = ∫du/(u(1+u^-1))
= ∫du/(u+1)
= ln(u+1) + C
= ln(e^x + 1) + C
#

Next question:
Find all real x such that:
|4x - 1| > 2 sqrt(x(1-x))
 

Mountain.Dew

Magician, and Lawyer.
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
825
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
icycloud said:
Next question:
Find all real x such that:
|4x - 1| > 2 sqrt(x(1-x))
more of my 2 cents...
first of all, we have a domain restriction -->x(1-x) >= 0, since a sqrted number cant be negative IN the real number system.

so, domain is restricted (so far) to 0 <= x <= 1

|4x-1| > 2sqrt(x(1-x)) ----> (4x-1)^2 > 4(x)(1-x)
16x^2 -8x + 1 > 4x(1-x)
16x^2 - 8x + 1 > 4x-4x^2
20x^2-12x+1 > 0 --> after factorising...
(10x-1)(2x-1) > 0, clearly observed from graph of y=(10x-1)(2x-1), that the solutions are --> x < 10, x > 1/2

but, we have restriction in domain... 0 <= x <= 1

FINAL solution is --> 0 < x < 1/10, 1/2 < x < 1.
 
Last edited:

Mountain.Dew

Magician, and Lawyer.
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
825
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
icycloud said:
Next Question:
Change of themes here :). Find ∫dx/( sqrt(x) * (1+x)).
more 2 cents thrown around here.
I = ∫dx/( sqrt(x) * (1+x))
let u = sqrt x.

du/dx = 1/2sqrt x, dx = 2sqrt x du = 2u du

so, I = ∫ 2u du / u(1+u2) = 2 ∫ du/(1+u2)
I = 2 tan-1u + c
I = 2 tan-1sqrt(x) + c
 

Mountain.Dew

Magician, and Lawyer.
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
825
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
im sorry Templar, didnt know that u already had answered it. my bad.

now, heres the next question:

From 2001 Ext 1 HSC paper

6(b)

Consider the variable pt P(2at, at^2) on the parabola x^2=4ay

(i) prove that the equation of the normal at P is x + ty = at^3 + 2at
(ii) find coordinates of pt Q such that the normal at Q is perpendicular to the normal at P.
(iii) show that the two normals intersect at R, whos coordinates are:

x= a(t - 1/t) and y=a(t^2 + 1 + 1/t^2)
(iv) find the equation in cartesian form of the locus of the point R given in part (iii)
 

Templar

P vs NP
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Messages
1,979
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Mountain.Dew said:
im sorry Templar, didnt know that u already had answered it. my bad.
I didn't answer it, and that wasn't my point. I just noticed that your solution is different to Keypad's, so could you please check your working, in particular with the inequality for x when solving the quadratic.
 

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Mountain.Dew said:
From 2001 Ext 1 HSC paper

6(b)

Consider the variable pt P(2at, at^2) on the parabola x^2=4ay

(i) prove that the equation of the normal at P is x + ty = at^3 + 2at
(ii) find coordinates of pt Q such that the normal at Q is perpendicular to the normal at P.
(iii) show that the two normals intersect at R, whos coordinates are:

x= a(t - 1/t) and y=a(t^2 + 1 + 1/t^2)
(iv) find the equation in cartesian form of the locus of the point R given in part (iii)
This wasn't such a bad question, it stretches your manipulative algebra a bit near the end.

P(2at, at2); x2 = 4ay

i) Differentiating wrt x:
4ay' = 2x
y' = x/(2a)

Thus the gradient of the tangent @ P is:

mT = (2at)/(2a) = t

And hence the gradient of the normal @ P is:

mN = -1/mT = -1/t

Substituting into the equation: m = (y - y1)/(x - x1) yields:

(y - at2)/(x - 2at) = -1/t
at3 - yt = x - 2at

x + ty = at3 + 2at ... (1)

As required.

ii) Set: Q(2atQ,atQ2)

Which means the gradient of the normal at Q is:

mNQ = -1/tQ

Now, as these normals are perpendicular, we require:
mNQmN = -1
I.e. tQ = -1/t ... (2)

Thus we have found the point Q:
Q(-2a/t,a/t2)

iii) Substituting (2) into (1), we find that the normal at Q has equation:

x + tQy = atQ3 + 2atQ
(*t3)
t3x + t2(-1)y = (-1)3a + 2at2(-1)

Thus:

t2(y - tx) = a + 2at2
(y - tx) = (a + 2at2)/t2 ... (3)

To find the points of intersection:

(1)t + (2):
y + t2y = at4 + 2at2 + a/t2 + 2a

y(1 + t2) = a([t4 + t2] + [t2 + 1] + [1 + 1/t2])

Note that each of those square brackets is directly dividable by 1 + t2

y = a((t4 + t2)/(t2 + 1) + (t2 + 1)/(t2 + 1) + (1 + 1/t2)/(1 + t2))
=a(t2 + 1 + 1/t2)

(1) - (2)t:
x + t2x = at3 + 2at -(a/t)(1 + 2t2)
x(1 + t2) = (a/t)(t4 + 2t2 - 1 - 2t2)
=(a/t)(t4 - 1)
=(a/t)(t2 - 1)(t2 + 1)

I.e.
x = (a/t)(t2 - 1)
x = a(t - 1/t)

As required.

iv) Note: (t - 1/t)2 = t2 - 1 + 1/t2

Thus:

(x/a)2 = y/a - 3
x2 = ay - 3a2
I love those little tricks.
 
Last edited:

Mountain.Dew

Magician, and Lawyer.
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
825
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Templar said:
I didn't answer it, and that wasn't my point. I just noticed that your solution is different to Keypad's, so could you please check your working, in particular with the inequality for x when solving the quadratic.
thank you templar for pointing out the flaw in my working out.

the original post has been edited.
 

Templar

P vs NP
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Messages
1,979
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Mountain.Dew said:
KeypadSDM, please post up the next question. :)
Firstly he doesn't bother with posting questions much, and secondly he's away until January 21st, so feel free to post your question.
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Mountain Dew, feel free to post the next question. ;)
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
∫t2 - t - 2 / (t+1)(2t+5) dt

= ∫ (t-2)/(2t+5) dt

Let u = 2t+5 [t = (u-5) /2]
du = 2dx [dx = du/2]

= ∫ [(u-9)/2] / u du/2
= 1/4 ∫ u-9/u du
= 1/4 ∫ 1 - 9/u du
= 1/4 [u - 9ln u] + C
= 1/4 [(2t+5) - 9ln(2t+5)] + C

Next Question:

Evaluate

∫ sec3x tanx dx
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mountain.Dew

Magician, and Lawyer.
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
825
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
pLuvia said:
Next Question:

Evaluate

∫ sec3x tanx dx
*another 2 cents thrown around*

I =∫ sec3x tanx dx

let u = secx
du/dx = secxtanx --> dx = du/secxtanx

I =∫ u3 tanx * du/ u*tanx
I = ∫ u2 du
I = u3/3 + c = sec3x/3 + c

of course, this is the proper way of doing it, but can get same result from being merely observant, considering the implications of the chain rule.
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Don't forget to post your question after you answer one. :p
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top