MedVision ad

27 Wtf (1 Viewer)

alez

feel like an angel
Joined
Mar 26, 2007
Messages
276
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
i put 5.6. figured they would have put the resistance in there to catch some people
and the resistor was before the wire and voltmeter
took a guess
 

runnable

Active Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
1,412
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
We were supposed to subtract 2 ohms from whatever we got for our inverse of the gradient (resistance).. Damn..
 

dolbinau

Active Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2006
Messages
1,334
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Oh yeah, I think that must be right. I changed my answer from that too. Ok 4 marks gone from question 27 now, LOL. God that's horrible.
 

alez

feel like an angel
Joined
Mar 26, 2007
Messages
276
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
lol i fucked up the last bit. with the explanation for the dodgy value
couldnt think of anything. made up the biggest load of shit
 

dwarven

[SMSHS'08']
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
700
Location
...
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
lol dude
nothing you can do to change it now.
just dw about it and focus on ur next one.
 

frogbutt

Ugliest Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Messages
61
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
cookiemonsterz said:
oooh that reminds me. the very last part of q 27. Why is one of the points off the line. I put because the wire is not a perfect ohmic conductor and therefore wont conform perfectly to v=IR. thoughts?
no they were ohmic conductors because they passed through the origin and were linear.

it was just an outlier because at the higher voltage, heat caused the resistance to increase and so the current was a bit less.
 
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
55
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
What is this about subtracting 2 ohms???
what i did...

drew the graph.
found the inverse of the gradient, 7.5 ohms.
wire x was pure because it had a larger gradient and thus smaller resistance.
because it is not perfectly ohmic, it was ohmic untill the voltage got to a certain level, the fact that "heat caused the resistance to increase and so the current was a bit less" is actually evidence of this.
 

dolbinau

Active Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2006
Messages
1,334
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
dwarven said:
lol dude
nothing you can do to change it now.
just dw about it and focus on ur next one.
No more. It's all over (exam wise). I do need to get over it though, hehe.

What is this about subtracting 2 ohms???
Diagram of circuit had 2 ohm resistor.
 

duy.le

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
137
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Pwnage101 said:
lol yeh im pretty sure i got that wrong, i changed my asnwer from that to 'the ammeter goes up to 2.50 only' LMAO i cant stop laughing at how stoopid my asnwer was, oh well, it fit pretty well at the time ----> 1 mark

and did we have to subtract 2 ohms from our answers (ie inverso fo the gradient of graph) caus ethere was a 2 ohm resistor in teh circuit??
HOLY SHIT MAYB
 

dwarven

[SMSHS'08']
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
700
Location
...
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
dolbinau said:
No more. It's all over (exam wise). I do need to get over it though, hehe.
same here :D

nothing to do now tho :S
 

Aaron.Judd

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2008
Messages
372
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
You got 2 marks if you plotted the points and drew a line of best fit correctly. Some peopel I know missed it.
 

pdoueihi

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2007
Messages
61
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
dolbinau said:
Was that just part of the 2 mark question about which one is pure, Alez?

2 marks to find resistance, 2 marks for Pure one, 1 mark for Outlier - It's out of 6. What am I missing?
what u put for outlier? i put that the current was on too long and heated up to higher resistance. right or wrong?
 
C

Chrisssss

Guest
Looks like hardly anyone thought of the resistor (I didn't either)
And was I the only one who simply said regarding the outlier that a probable cause was human error? I just said that human error could cause the outlier due to inaccurate reading or what not. I really didn't know what the hell I was doing with that Q though.
 

dolbinau

Active Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2006
Messages
1,334
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Chrisssss said:
Looks like hardly anyone thought of the resistor (I didn't either)
And was I the only one who simply said regarding the outlier that a probable cause was human error? I just said that human error could cause the outlier due to inaccurate reading or what not. I really didn't know what the hell I was doing with that Q though.
I said human error too. And yeah this question, LOL, God. It's like year 11 work (almost) and I got 4 marks wrong!!
 

independantz

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2007
Messages
409
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Aaron.Judd said:
You got 2 marks if you plotted the points and drew a line of best fit correctly. Some peopel I know missed it.
Wtf? I never saw this Q.
 

Aaron.Judd

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2008
Messages
372
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
independantz said:
Wtf? I never saw this Q.
It was right at the top. It sort of just looked like they were explaining it, but you defiantly got 2 marks to plot the graph/trend line it.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top