• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

2013 Federal election (4 Viewers)

2013 Federal Election: 2PP Voting Intention

  • Liberal / National Coalition

    Votes: 101 50.0%
  • Australian Labor Party

    Votes: 101 50.0%

  • Total voters
    202

Emily Howard

Active Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2013
Messages
351
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
1998
i luv how dey hav used gay marriage as the draw card now

we all knew it was going to come through eventually it was just at da mercy ov pollies who want support
 

Sathius005

Active Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
716
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2008
Uni Grad
2018
Rudd lands killer blow to Abbott in the Great Debate.
Source: Australian Financial Review

Kevin Rudd has kept alive his election hopes with a hard fought debate against Tony Abbott in which he dominated and landed a knock out blow to Tony Abbott. Kevin Rudd was also chosen the winner by a group of undecided voters. In the one and only head-to-head debate between the two Leaders before the September 7 election, Mr Rudd made one promise- a conscience vote on legalising gay marriage within the first 100 days of the new Parliament- while Mr Abbott to not rule out changes to the GST as part of the white paper on tax reform he will commission if elected Prime Minister. The GST is on the table and is part of the equation Mr Abbott insisted, prompting Mr Rudd to ask Mr Abbott why he is hell bent on increasing the GST to 20 per cent. After the debate, the Channel Nine worm, which was controlled by a weighted sample of 100 undecided voters, and which was mostly favourable to Mr Rudd throughout, awarded Mr Rudd the debate 59 per cent to 41 per cent.

"This election is about a clear choice on the economy, on jobs, on how we support families under pressure and how we support education and health," Mr Rudd proclaimed.
"We are a great country but we can't afford a Coalition government because of toxic cuts to the bone against health, education, the public service and welfare",added Mr Rudd.
 
Last edited:

TheGreatest99.95

Premium Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2010
Messages
655
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
who the fuck cares? why should the ability to memorise some facts and figures be so important?
you realise this can be said for Rudd too. If it didnt matter why did he do it? he should have been able to do it without the notes. he obviously knew shit all and expected to out there and just read off the paper. He underestimated Abbott. Its not so much the fact he broke the rules but that he was that unprepared (despite calling out Abbott every time he could) and that he was so desperate. School kid stuff
 

TheGreatest99.95

Premium Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2010
Messages
655
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
In fact I'd go as far to say that the debate will mark the beginning of the end for Rudd, it's just a question of how big the LNP majority will be now
+1 and the worst bit for Rudd is that he brought it all upon himself. He constantly called for there to be a debate and it backfired something fierce. Rudd also should have struck with more force especially where Abbott didnt know shit about his own budget, Rudd let it slip... I think he was startled that Abbott was doing so well. I expected Abbott to go out and blow himself up with his umms and arghhs and stupid shit.
 

Fightomo

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2013
Messages
2
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I just want to put it out there I saw Abbot using and writing notes during the debate. He was the first one I saw doing so. I remember thinking to myself "well Ruddy should write stuff down too". Everyone is against Rudd (the media). It so sad. They want him to crash so hard.

Also Abbot to me didnt seem like he knew what he was talking about. Most of it was getting pulled out of his ass. When the questioned about Aged care came out, he made that paperwork shit on the spot. Think about it. Thats all he could come up with?
 
Last edited:

Emily Howard

Active Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2013
Messages
351
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
1998
I just want to put it out there I saw Abbot using and writing notes during the debate. He was the first one I saw doing so. I remember thinking to myself "well Ruddy should write stuff down too". Everyone is against Rudd (the media). It so sad. They want him to crash so hard.

Also Abbot to me didnt seem like he knew what he was talking about. Most of it was getting pulled out of his ass. When the questioned about Aged care came out, he made that paperwork shit on the spot. Think about it. Thats all he could come up with?
yer allowed to write notes u dolt

u just cant take in preprepared notes
 

Fightomo

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2013
Messages
2
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
yer allowed to write notes u dolt

u just cant take in preprepared notes
Well... I feel like a idiot. This changes everything.
LOL JOKES (to an extent)


Doesn't change the fact that everyone is all up in arms over this stupid matter
 

townie

Premium Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2004
Messages
9,646
Location
Gladesville
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Uni Grad
2009
I agree it's stupid for it t be an issue, but it's even stupider for Rudd not to have realized that it would have been made an issue of. As thegreatest99.5 said above, Rudd has been calling for a debate for weak, you think he might have actually been prepared.
 

nerdasdasd

Dont.msg.me.about.english
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
5,353
Location
A, A
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2017
I agree it's stupid for it t be an issue, but it's even stupider for Rudd not to have realized that it would have been made an issue of. As thegreatest99.5 said above, Rudd has been calling for a debate for weak, you think he might have actually been prepared.
Week, week , week!!!! Not weak.....
 

lochnessmonsta

Booging
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Messages
157
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Uni Grad
2017
Rudd lands killer blow to Abbott in the Great Debate.
Source: Australian Financial Review

Kevin Rudd has kept alive his election hopes with a hard fought debate against Tony Abbott in which he dominated and landed a knock out blow to Tony Abbott. Kevin Rudd was also chosen the winner by a group of undecided voters. In the one and only head-to-head debate between the two Leaders before the September 7 election, Mr Rudd made one promise- a conscience vote on legalising gay marriage within the first 100 days of the new Parliament- while Mr Abbott to not rule out changes to the GST as part of the white paper on tax reform he will commission if elected Prime Minister. The GST is on the table and is part of the equation Mr Abbott insisted, prompting Mr Rudd to ask Mr Abbott why he is hell bent on increasing the GST to 20 per cent. After the debate, the Channel Nine worm, which was controlled by a weighted sample of 100 undecided voters, and which was mostly favourable to Mr Rudd throughout, awarded Mr Rudd the debate 59 per cent to 41 per cent.

"This election is about a clear choice on the economy, on jobs, on how we support families under pressure and how we support education and health," Mr Rudd proclaimed.
"We are a great country but we can't afford a Coalition government because of toxic cuts to the bone against health, education, the public service and welfare",added Mr Rudd.
You're wrongly quoting a source. The actual title was "leaders fail to land killer blow".

The first three paragraphs were this -

"Kevin Rudd has kept alive his election hopes with a hard-fought debate against Tony Abbott in which neither leader landed a knockout blow but Mr Rudd was the chosen winner by undecided voters.

In the one and only head-to-head debate between the two before the *September 7 election, Mr Rudd made one promise – a conscience vote on legalising gay marriage within the first 100 days of the new Parliament – while Mr Abbott declined to rule out examining changes to the GST as part of the white paper on tax reform he will commission if elected.

“The GST doesn’t change under the Coalition,’’ Mr Abbott insisted, prompting Mr Rudd to ask him why was the tax being examined as part of the Coalition’s white paper."



And Rudd never said this ""We are a great country but we can't afford a Coalition government because of toxic cuts to the bone against health, education, the public service and welfare",added Mr Rudd"
 

Rafy

Retired
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
10,719
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Uni Grad
2008
Rudd lands killer blow to Abbott in the Great Debate.
Source: Australian Financial Review

Kevin Rudd has kept alive his election hopes with a hard fought debate against Tony Abbott in which he dominated and landed a knock out blow to Tony Abbott. Kevin Rudd was also chosen the winner by a group of undecided voters. In the one and only head-to-head debate between the two Leaders before the September 7 election, Mr Rudd made one promise- a conscience vote on legalising gay marriage within the first 100 days of the new Parliament- while Mr Abbott to not rule out changes to the GST as part of the white paper on tax reform he will commission if elected Prime Minister. The GST is on the table and is part of the equation Mr Abbott insisted, prompting Mr Rudd to ask Mr Abbott why he is hell bent on increasing the GST to 20 per cent. After the debate, the Channel Nine worm, which was controlled by a weighted sample of 100 undecided voters, and which was mostly favourable to Mr Rudd throughout, awarded Mr Rudd the debate 59 per cent to 41 per cent.

"This election is about a clear choice on the economy, on jobs, on how we support families under pressure and how we support education and health," Mr Rudd proclaimed.
"We are a great country but we can't afford a Coalition government because of toxic cuts to the bone against health, education, the public service and welfare",added Mr Rudd.
Do not misquote. Quote it verbatim or not at all.
 

Graney

Horse liberty
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
4,434
Location
Bereie
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Stop the notes.

Why is Janet Albrechtsen. It bothers me, in a sort of existential despair, that Peter Costello and Peter Reith, the people who ran the Liberal party, are much more critical and analytical of the Liberal party, than alleged 'journalist' Albrechtsen. I don't care about her work or influence or whatever, I'm just existentially disturbed by how she has transcended all decent human morality, and for seemingly no reason, when people like Reith or Latham can maintain a media profile without such extreme rimming. What would drive a person to that level of slavish depravity? There's a whole group of similar opinion columnists on the right, who abandon all independent thought, in a way that makes Peter Reith look moderate and intellectual.

I'd speculate it's an easy way of writing to a deadline, and the school of Australian writers who write like this are less intelligent than former politicians.
 

lee337

Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2012
Messages
186
Location
Munich
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2017
Janet is such a scumbag. Why does she even have a bloody job!!!
 

JohnMaximus

shepherd of the people
Joined
Mar 28, 2013
Messages
585
Location
Elysium
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Mr Rudd made one promise- a conscience vote on legalising gay marriage within the first 100 days of the new Parliament-
Looks like all Labor has to offer is gimmicks.

But hell, it's worked before. The reason JG ever got in power was because she was Australia's opportunity to have a first female prime minister.
 

TheGreatest99.95

Premium Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2010
Messages
655
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Looks like all Labor has to offer is gimmicks.

But hell, it's worked before. The reason JG ever got in power was because she was Australia's opportunity to have a first female prime minister.
no she got in because she cut better deals with the independents to form a majority
 

Kiraken

RISK EVERYTHING
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
1,908
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Looks like all Labor has to offer is gimmicks.

But hell, it's worked before. The reason JG ever got in power was because she was Australia's opportunity to have a first female prime minister.
lolwat
 

Graney

Horse liberty
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
4,434
Location
Bereie
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Gillard became prime minister because she was significantly more popular with her colleagues, Rudd had made enemies of every faction, she was also more popular with the Australian public, polling higher than Rudd at the time of the leadership challenge, Rudd may have lost the 2010 election outright based on contemporary polling.

Her popularity with colleagues, and their choice to nominate Gillard, was vindicated, as she was able to work with the factions within the Labor party in a far more cooperative leadership style than Rudd, during her term.
 

Sathius005

Active Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
716
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2008
Uni Grad
2018
Rudd is a better leader than Gillard.

Source: Sathius005
Rudd is attracting a greater vote than Gillard in terms of the two party preferred vote in the 2013 federal election. Gillard attracted 43 per cent of the 2PP vote in June 2013, Kevin Rudd attracts 48 per cent of the 2PP vote. Rudd is more popular with the voters than Gillard as manifested by his net approval ratings.
 

townie

Premium Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2004
Messages
9,646
Location
Gladesville
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Uni Grad
2009
Rudd is a better leader than Gillard.

Source: Sathius005
Rudd is attracting a greater vote than Gillard in terms of the two party preferred vote in the 2013 federal election. Gillard attracted 43 per cent of the 2PP vote in June 2013, Kevin Rudd attracts 48 per cent of the 2PP vote. Rudd is more popular with the voters than Gillard as manifested by his net approval ratings.
Groundbreaking information
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)

Top