fishbulb
Member
Just something to ponder on....
Last edited:
lol, yeh. But truth be told, 2u scaling is bad.Timothy.Siu said:lol, nice...makes 2unit scaling look horrible in comparison
HEHE you should do that graph for usPwnage101 said:lol ppl think this is good, but what if someone did RAW marks vs aligned marks (not that we have the info, but IF we did)
then do a final RAW marks vs Scaled marks - it would be such an inflation, compared to 2U!! lol
lol, thats very true, it'll be like that graph except swap 2unit and 4unit with raw marks on the x axis and aligned on the yPwnage101 said:lol ppl think this is good, but what if someone did RAW marks vs aligned marks (not that we have the info, but IF we did)
then do a final RAW marks vs Scaled marks - it would be such an inflation, compared to 2U!! lol
there is in my graph thing so yea. scroll down and read pl0x?cxlxoxk said:Cool, except there's no General Maths...
i meant the first one...but thanks for letting me know ur one had general...dp624 said:there is in my graph thing so yea. scroll down and read pl0x?
im only guessing but probably 50/120Silver Persian said:Hmm...so 90 in 2U Maths is equal to a 74 in 4U maths aye. I wonder what raw mark you would need to get 74+ in 4U...