• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

2005 Q8 (2 Viewers)

who_loves_maths

I wanna be a nebula too!!
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
600
Location
somewhere amidst the nebulaic cloud of your heart
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Originally Posted by withoutaface
The propositions were:
a) A number that is not the root of any polynomial with integer coefficients.
b) A number that is not the root of any polynomial with rational coefficients.

Any polynomial indicates any polynomial; equation, expression or otherwise.
^ yeah but that's just the point. it is NOT just ANY polynomial, equations or expressions...

because like i said, rational and integer polynomial expressions are NOT equivalent... whilst rational and integer polynomial equations are equivalent.

i understand that you still do not see the point i have tried to make, but it doesn't matter to me anymore, i am confident of what i know over this issue now. there's not much more that can be said over this, so you can have the last word if you want...
 

Dumsum

has a large Member;
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
1,552
Location
Maroubra South
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
P(x) = x/2 + 1
G(x) = x + 2

P(x) = (x+2)/2
= G(x)/2

Therefore, if a number α is not a zero of G(x), it's also not a zero of P(x).

Here's what I think: withoutaface, when you say "Any polynomial with rational coeffecients can be expressed as one with integer coefficients by multiplying both sides by the product of the denominators," I think it's more correct to say "Any polynomial with rational co-efficients can be expressed in terms of one with integer co-efficients."

who_loves_maths:
Even though the two polynomials are not equivalent (choose a number, say 1, P(1) doesn't equal G(1)), I'm inclined to say that it is SUFFICIENT to say a transcendental number is a number which is not a zero of any polynomial with integer co-efficients.
 
Last edited:

Affinity

Active Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
2,062
Location
Oslo
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
Dumsum said:
2001 we had irrationality of e.
2003 we had irrationality of pi.

What shall we have in 2005? :p
prove that the HSC is irrational
 

lum

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
137
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
wholovesmaths, r u srsly in yr 12? damn, u know a lot... but then again, i'm SURE i dun wanna do maths in uni now, not after these discussions... u guys seem a bit... queer, no offence
 

NT-social

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
97
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
hehe

Affinity said:
prove that the HSC is irrational
... thats a good one(can u believe dis is my first ever reply,since registering @ dis site, and for what? lol
 

haboozin

Do you uhh.. Yahoo?
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
708
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
lum said:
wholovesmaths, r u srsly in yr 12? damn, u know a lot... but then again, i'm SURE i dun wanna do maths in uni now, not after these discussions... u guys seem a bit... queer, no offence

WLM, you tend to cover up your idendity, do not tell anyone what school you go to etc.

What are you affraid of?
 

Dumsum

has a large Member;
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
1,552
Location
Maroubra South
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
haboozin said:
WLM, you tend to cover up your idendity, do not tell anyone what school you go to etc.

What are you affraid of?
All those internet stalkers that lurk on this site.
 

haboozin

Do you uhh.. Yahoo?
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
708
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Dumsum said:
All those internet stalkers that lurk on this site.


I'm yet to see a stalker with a fettish of a maths nerd.
 

flower_farie

Hot Pink Mitten
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
22
Location
Manly
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Uh, r normal HSC students suppose to understand what that actually meant (the stuff on the first page) cauz i never got taught that im im really scared that some ppl actually know what that stuff means
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top