I don't think that's 100% true....I agree that it's a shame that in the end everything comes down to learning how to pass an exam rather than learning for the sake of expanding our minds. But I DO think that yr 12 has been of huge value to me, and to many of my friends. Education isn't about preparing us for the workplace, as lucyinthehole said. If that's why I was in yr 12 I'd just go to tafe or hotel school or something. It's about teaching you to think broadly, challenge your perceptions, and develop your understanding and your intellect. These are invaluable lessons that will stay with you through life and will be of way more use to you than knowing how to use microsoft excel.Finchster said:Its bad enough that they make this English course compulsory and disadvantage the scientifically and mathematically gifted people let alone put every student throughout the state through this ridiculous testing process that will be of no value to anyone.
i know what you mean. but that is the most stupid way of discriminating between students knowledge. One person getting 100% may know a shit load more than another person, but since they write slower they dont do as well. this is just the boards lazy way of discriminating between students, and it makes for a less reliable system of testing students.jumb said:Let ME ask YOU a theoretical question:
How do you tell who is better, out of 2 people getting 100%?
You cant, so they apply these time limits give a wider range of marks. If we had more time, almost everyone would get 100%.
This is the only way to do it. Case closed.
never again will anyone make us discuss themes, techniques, interpretations and context either..mind u if they did i'd probably kill em on the spotFinchster said:Never in your career will you do something like the English exam, never again in your life will you be under the pressure of forty-minutes and be forced to recall three essays consecutively within the span of two hours.