That's insanely thin dude, eat some food!wrong_turn said:
Do you need me to sex you first?(^o^) said:
argh.. HEY YOU!!! GIVE THAT DUCK BACK TO XIAO!! >_______<'JKDDragon said:
That's bad, dude. You're the typical example of the naturally skinny person who tends to be unhealthier than many obese people. How? Because often, many obese people are forced to somewhat watch their diet as to not gain any more weight. This includes eating healthy foods and eating in a more healthy way, such as spreading out meals etc. They're just still fat because of their slow metabolic rate, perhaps high appetite and even genetic reasons. You, on the other hand acknowledge that no matter what you eat, you still won't gain a pound, because of your high BMR. Therefore you dwell on junk 24/7 and overall have a far more unhealthy lifestyle. This concept is a recognised fact by dieticians, doctors and exercise physiologists. So remember kiddies, just because someone's alot fatter than you doesn't actually mean they're alot unhealthier than you. Often you may be surprised to find that it's the other way round. Ironic, eh?Ragerunner said:
Define unhealthy.JKDDragon said:
Physiologically unhealthy. Looks mean more to you than health? You won't be thinking that when you're 40. There's also a dilemma with 'looks' since you're gonna have massive trouble trying to gain muscle should you ever want to. Looks wise, you're pretty much stuck with being scrawny. At the moment, looks mean more to me than health too. That's why I prefer a slower metabolic rate? Why? Cause then I can become buff, or stay skinny. With you, you're pretty much condemned to staying skinny. The only advantage I see of having an extremely fast metabolic rate is the fact that you can eat shitloads of good food. Looks wise for me, it would be bad cause I would hate to being scrawny. Health wise, it can also be bad since you get carried away with eating shitloads of saturated fat and sugar.Ragerunner said:
Who says? Dieticians and sports scientists.Ragerunner said:
