Search results

What the hell.. I was just explaining that logical reasoning should be applied to all beliefs, you seem to have accepted that yet still attack me for advocating it?

Oh of course not! To truely understand the koran you must have read the arabic version, the different interpretations, etc etc etc etc otherwise you cannot make an informed comment on the religion. I get this from christians too, claiming unless you have read the aramaic version of the bible...

If you can't justify it in an intelligent way... then yes. You need some sort of rational reason for having your 'different view', otherwise you are acting foolishly. Surely if I said 'Islam sux' you would simply call me an idiot instead of saying 'well, he choose a different view to me and...

It's like me trying to claim that I have an answer for everything but it's just to amazing for me to share... It's stupid, and the same claim you make for the koran can be made for any religious text.

So you believe in Huitzilopochtli and all the aztec gods eh? Or do you believe that really the weather wasn't determined by the sacrafices and the entire act was just barbaric and foolish? There really is quite a good comparison to be made (I believe) between the aztecs and the theists of today.

Because it is just empty... Say you ask me "what is your view on taxes" and I reply "All the water in the world, if it were used as ink, would not be enough for me to write my true perspective on taxes." It's just empty crap that doesn't further any sort of argument.

I don't think people are stupid for having a different view to me, I just think they're stupid in that particular thing they are dealing with. I'm sure you could be a very smart person...

How so am I an idiot? You're an idiot because you're openly criticising the verisimilitude of a religious text while openly embracing another that are extremely similar.

Yea I was going to edit and remove the word only... Whatever I can say that about anything, that's just empty crap.... why do you actually write something like that?

I constantly contribute to this forum (see posts), I just think alot of you people are complete idiots and the shit you go on with is boring.

That's exactly what I said So now you can understand why to criticise christianity you should focus on the new testament, just as people who criticise islam should only focus on the koran.

I do want to be involved, you tried to claim christians have to follow both the new and old testament.... which shows your complete misunderstanding of the christian faith.

The new testament is seen to be a set of laws which came after the old testament... where there is a conflict you're supposed to side with the new testament. By the way, the Koran is a piece of trash... as is the bible. Stop analysing this boring repetitive shit and wasting your time please...

But what constitutes a 'stupid' reason? Can you just... not feel like it one day, but he says 'that's not a good enough reason! we got married! sex is my right!' and that's not rape?

How funny is it when muslims laugh at the christians or christians laugh at the muslims... what a bunch of idiots. Both your faiths rest on a foundation of bullshit, I suggest before you go criticising another faith you first examine your own.

Get tutoring from laurie_fields, he guarentee's a uai of 100.

It's because A) It's a HUGE workload, and B) They do NOT go well together... at all... I can understand how people at mq bank might respect comm/law students, this makes sense to me with most commerce majors, but Actutarial does not mix with law at all.

Well I can understand why they would want someone with commerce / law, majoring in perhaps IB, but why actuarial / law?

The purpose of UOW is to supply education for / graduates to the community of woolongong. It is a regional university, like UNCLE or UWS. However UWS is in a particularily difficult position as it is often (due to proximity) a possible choice for sydney sighters.

melsc i do believe they have set it so that the cut-off for parramatta and campbelltown are to be exactly the same.