Search results

how many times a night did u fap over him?

oh yeah I agree with serius and dom re: the punishment.

SCIENTOLOGIST DETECTED! Srsly though, without elaborating on this I might agree or disagree with you... I definitely find behavioral neuroscience to be scientific in the very least.

The stanford prison experiment hardly classifies as a real scientific experiment, tbh.

lol what a load of garbage, I'm going to go watch some gore now for pure entertainment just out of spite.

Hi plato, The thing is that if such things are what the community values, then these people will have more sway in the political system (if they so choose). I don't think we should dictate what a society should value, cause for instance I don't think sporting heros should have any more say than...

We're not a democracy anyway tbqh, we have a much better system of government. We are for the most part a meritocracy in that only those who work very hard, are very shrewd, are keenly intelligent etc will rise to power in business, government or even academia. On the outside however we appear...

I actually don't think their spending money on drugs is all that wasteful.

victims are too fast.

Agnosticism?

food tech is a science

I luv u.

It would be silly for me to claim that they could be unbiased in my opinion, as much as that may be the goal and even their desire. This isn't to say that their research is to be taken with a grain of salt, definitely not, as long as the methodology is not flawed the research is fine.... My...

Tim Flannery is definitely a biologist, in fact quite the respected one from my understanding. Also I'm not particularly certain I'd want to take the word of people who have decided to devote their lives to whales, they obviously are quite fond of the creatures so I'm cautious about what would...

Kangaroos are not endangered... Neither are some whales, in fact some scientists maintain that the culling of minke whales is sustainable - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Flannery#Sustainable_whaling I wonder what endangers more whales (at least for instance minke whales), is it the small...

When a shareholder buys a share in a company they are still subject to the constitution of the company including any provisions for corporate governance.... If you buy a share where you are told for instance that you will not have voting rights on certain matters in the prospectus or whatever...

IT CAUSES THE AUDIENCE TO REFLECT ON THE AMBIGUOUS NATURE OF OUR OWN CIVILIZATIONS FUTURE AND WHETHER IT WILL END UP GOING THE PATH OF THE CIVILIZATION IN BLADE RUNNER IMO. lol

The idea wouldn't be that there's a gene which makes you 'fat', that's just silly, more it's that there are people who are more likely, biologically, to be susceptible to over eating given the right environment. I.e. Sure there werent heaps of fatties 50 years ago, but they didn't have fast food...

Well one thing I don't necessarily like is this idea that share holders should get a vote specifically on their payout. It matters little to me, but I think it makes more sense that they follow whatever regulations the company has set up.

Is holding a position that something is neither moral nor immoral (i.e. amoral) a normative ethical position?