All u people who say bio is crap only think so because u must look at it so superficially. If you can say that all the intricacies of protein synthesis, DNA coiling and supercoiling, ATP molecule usage, mechanisms for genetic variability to increase chance of survival, the role of a SINGLE GENE...
Pftt i was like research into the function and structure of non-coding regions of DNA not expressed in phenotypes etc. Crapped on about how the HGP gave the sequence for these regions and how this could provide the basis for further comparisons of non-coding regions with coding regions and what...
DAMMMNN the effing control in the agar experiment... you'd think i would've learnt by now....
Anyho, nothing substantial on T/B cells! So annoying!! I love that stuff
I also wrote companion cell & sieve tube element. Except the "companion cell" didnt have a nucleus so im a bit concerned...
ahhh shit. i did that!! God damn....... except i did it in terms of 'memorability' because together and separately they convey such a powerful vision etc, played down (to an accepted extent) the individual integrity of each. hope that's ok.. eeeek...
I did The Second Coming, Sailing to Byzantium and Byzantium. Why is it bad to do the latter two together in one essay?? Never heard of that.... and slightly worried coz my essay was quite the bomb
Yeh I did one- I wrote in my introduction that i was going to do two
(because i was planning on it at that stage...) but didn't get time!! I just wrote a conclusion and forgot to cross it out in my intro!! Will I loose marks? PLEASE SAY NO!