Search results

my writing is pretty tiny to be honest. my english teacher left halfway through the year and up until then he said it was fine but we/r.

Really? I thought it was the easiest in like 6 years.

Nah it was 14. I wrote 13 for Module C as well. Only 11 for Module B :(

Definitely, quality over quantity. You can get an 18 with that length if it's good enough.

How many pages did you get out? Think I got a little over 40.

Top 20 school. (I got 104/105 in my trial).

Oh, then you have a good chance - ignore me. I thought you might have gone to a mediocre school and had an overestimation of your skill. You have a great chance

Well, yes. But one of the reasons it's so difficult to is because the HSC marks much more harshly than schools, and it's very subjective, with a wide margin of error before it goes to a third marker. So it's less about being exemplary at English, and more about being lucky on the day, getting...

Noo.... there's been like 2 100%s in the last decade. Usually 101/102+ can state rank.

Nice! That might even be a state rank. Hoping for 45/45 from yesterday, and 59 or 60 from today. Do you think a 101/102 (taking worst case scenario) would state rank?

I talked about the scene where he watches the guy masturbate as the central scene to the piece. Am I fucked?

Yeah I saw it in the exam and lol'd.

Depends how well you did it... if you explained it well (i.e. an emotional understanding of history is more important than a 'truthful' understanding, as all records of history are subjective), then you could get a 20. Don't sweat it, I was just explaining the most obvious interpretation.

Does anyone think they got 100+/105? (i.e. possibility of state rank?)

Jesus, "writing too loud". What a fuckwit.

MOD C EXPLAINED: (Obviously other interpretations are possible, however this was the intended interpretation). The prevailing view of history is one constructed by those in positions of power (i.e. history is written by the victor), rather than being an objective record of reality.

IMO I think that's the obvious/way you're supposed to interpret it, and I feel like your interpretation was squirreling a bit...

you're fine, the person you quoted is wrong. that is an incorrect interpretation.

hello state rank

how did you post this at 11:39