Search results

I know. I disagree with the legal perspective. I am stating my ethical point of view.

Yes it does, thank you. I haven't done anything on ellipses yet.

I don't understand why you are able to attack me because my point of view differs from yours. For one, I simply believe in people's individual responsibility to not fuck up. And I believe that people's decisions, such as whether to have sex or not, are entirely their own responsibility. And if...

Legally, yes. I don't believe it should be considered rape under the law. Ethically and philosophically it doesn't make sense.

Stupid troll? Or maybe they're not a troll and they really believe that shit. Either way their an idiot. Maybe I was wrong about the troll part, maybe I wasn't. Regardless, it's completely irrelevant.

I would stay but I have maths exam tomorrow. I will likely return in 24 hours to find my posts drowned in over fifteen pages of irrelevant babble and idiocy.

Exactly. Regretting your decisions while you are drunk does not mean you are raped. It means you made a bad decision. FAR from rape. And let's have another look at it here: You agreed to...what? Have sex? My god, how awful! Who in their right mind would want such a thing?

I am serious. 1) If the victim consents, then it's not rape. Taking advantage of someone's intoxication is not necessarily rape. And if they would consent normally, then there is no need to intoxicate. You are right on your last point. So if someone tries to get someone else REALLY drunk so...

A more compelling case: Guy (A) is approached by Girl (B) and B say's "want to fuck"? She is drunk as fuck. B wakes up next morning and realises they had sex and says "omg I've been raped". A points out she asked for it (like, literally, asked for it). But B still presses rape charges and A...

1) It's not "rape" unless they are physically and literally unable to consent. Such as in your second point. 2) No brainer. 3) Taking advantage, yes, but should not be defined as rape. 4) Obviously. This is the primary definition of rape. 5) Anyone can make their own decisions regardless of how...

I don't think anything should be banned, especially not in favour of a biased opinion held by the government on what is "acceptable". People should be able to be who they want to be and wear what they want to wear without fear of criminal prosecution. It is not the government's job to deny...

Not at all. I think the question of "is it right?" or "is it ethical?" is a much more important and compelling question. Is it to be defined as rape? Well, if the consent was under intoxication it's technically still consent. So you cannot call it "rape". People who call it rape either refuse...

I can't remember. I'll have another look at it after my maths exam tomorrow.

Grrr, i've filled three pages and I'm still a long way off. Although I did expand everything out and I'm in the middle of trying to re-factorise everything. Fuck.

What about the range? My first instinct is to say "all real Y" but that doesn't seem right. It looks like a circle or an ellipse maybe but I have no idea, and I'm not sure how to find out the range.

Not sure how to do this. I got -5 < x < 5 for domain, not sure if that's right. Any help is appreciated.

This

The fact that you think you have the right to label another couple's relationship as "messed up" is more messed up than the relationship itself. My opinion.

If both parties are consenting then why is it a problem? You can judge all you want but if a 17 year old is with a 29 year old and they are both happy together, leave them the fuck alone.