Search results

Hear hear. Women's Honi is quite frankly offensive.

Fair enough, but to be fairer, in this day and age there's an acceptable and logical alternative to being religious. Back then, there wasn't. Of course, there are many, many contemporary heroes in science who are religious, but their scientific prowess is usually in spite of their religion, not...

What has that got to do with anything?

Do they really? Are you sure about that? You're saying that before Christianity, say before 2000-odd years ago, nobody had any morals? No non-Christian, non-Western societies have any sort of values or morality?

Some other books for your reading list: - God is Not Great (Christopher Hitchens) - End of Faith (Sam Harris) - Godless (Dan Barker)

Hahahaha are you serious? Also, it's "atheist". A few things: - you "stole your idea from Dan Brown", so you can be forgiven for unoriginal thought here - science may have created the atom bomb, but it also created modern medicine, modern technology, and our ability to understand the...

Tell that to the giraffe. 90% of the sexual acts performed by giraffes are homosexual in nature. Yeah, not biologically unnatural, especially not in humans.

You've lived with this for 9 months? Change change change!

You still don't understand the difference between a theory and a law, do you?

I think you mean an IUD.

Incorrect. Evolution is Not Just a Theory: home

And society is not a product of evolution? It is. Societal constructs are therefore evolutionary, as they evolved to help deal with increasingly complex societal situations. It depends on what values and morality you're talking about, I guess. When I refer to morality, I refer to something...

As far as anything in biological science can be a fact? Yes. It has been proven beyond all reasonable doubt, which is as close to a fact as you can physically get in this context.

I meant for what I said for mirakon to read :)

Prove it. :p Or at least, tell us why you don't think this very good explanation for the existence and development of morality is at least implausible.

Which was my point in the first place. You can't prove evolution mathematically, but that doesn't mean it isn't fact. You can't prove existence mathematically, but that doesn't mean it isn't fact.

You said that if it can't be proven mathematically is isn't a fact. And so, therefore, your existence is as much of a fact as evolution, that is, not a fact. :)

So you can't prove your own existence. Therefore, your existence is not a fact. Okay.

Ayatollah is a troll.

Can you mathematically prove your own existence? :p