Search results

Yeah, the thing with my made up cases is that there are in fact real cases out there that I briefly remember the points of, and so I just fill in some extra details and make up a fake case. :D Like for example, I know there was a case of a transsexual male who was refused the right to marry his...

The case of Shar v. Irving(2004), where an Indian woman was forced by her father to wed another older Indian man had the marriage rendered void because of the forceful nature of the marriage. There was no consent. YEAHH!?!!

No problem brother! Feel free!

'Dead Beat Dads avoiding the childcare bullet', a news article published by the Australian on July, 2008, showed that even with the implementation of the Child Care payment board, father's were still able to avoid paying child support. This shows the ineffectiveness of the law when it comes to...

Fuck yeah! I think I'm gonna make up EVERYTHING other than legislation. I did it for Legal Studies, Economics, and Business Studies and wasn't caught out once. 'A brief history on human rights', authored by Dr. Max Shur and peer reviewed by the University of South Australia, showed that human...

AHAHAHAHAHAHA, do you go to Saint Charbel's?

Hey guys, Do you think if we make up cases/legal reports/news articles to support our points we'd get caught out?

Re: Something that made you say "my parents are so naive" That's a fucking cool quote man.

Are you sure the principal in second degree would receive the same punishment as the principal in first degree? And I don't know about your question.

Principle = That who committed the crime. Accessory before the fact = A person who helped the priniciple commit the crime. E.g. Loaded the gun which was used by the principle to shoot the victim. Accessory after the fact = A person who helped a person after the crime was committed. E.G...

Fucking LOL at John McCain.

AHAHAHA, I had a supervisor in year 10 keep gesturing to the other male supervisor to have a cigarette with him after the exam. It was well annoying because the guy wreaked of cigarettes.

Police must have a warrant to undertake a search unless legislation provides otherwise. For example, during the Cronulla riots of 2005, Police were given the power to search the property of anyone they suspected of intending to engage in illegal criminal behaviour. Police are able to seize...

Would 'the holocaust' also be acceptable?

Yeah, it just means involuntary movement caused by a condition, so I guess that could be used as a defense. But she was referring to autonomy, where all legal rights are given upon reaching legal age.

Criminal law: The law that involves the state, where the case is brought before a court by the state, who represent the Queen. Criminal law is used for more serious (indictable) offences, where the actions of one person infringe on the safety and security of the entire state. For example...

Nah, it's not called automatism. It's called autonomy.

Oh nice, thanks for the correction. So rendition is between the states of a country huh?

How do you get a child to solve a complex maths equation? Give them a calculator. I just made that one up. Anti-jokes are easy to make up.

Extradition is the process of transporting an accused from one country to the country where the original crime was committed. However, the countries must have an extradition treaty in place for the extradition to go ahead. For example, Tony Mokbel, a Melbourne man wanted for underworld crimes...