Search results

Just because it does not say he is condeming it does not mean he is condoning it.

sorry nothing else can be added to the Word of God, says so in revelation.

he could, but who are we to question his methods?

he is not human.

It is saying if you are a slave be obedient so that you are bringing Glory to God. It is not condoning slavery, more saying if you are a slave, behave like this.

God was writing his word through humans. And yes i do believe in the literal word of God, creation and all.

completely agree. It reads like that no interpretation needed.

how can it not be cut and dried, anyone with half a brain can understand what that i saying. If you can not grasp something as simple as that you are not as smart as i thought.

be obedient i think that is fair, I think that it is assumed that it is unless it is sinful. It is saying be obedient to bring glory to God.

Completely agree with that

how can we explain what we believe about those passages that you are talking about if you give us no references? Are you that determined to find flaws in christianity that you cannot even provide passages so that we can explain our views on them? you are the one that i pity.

how can you be greek orthodox if you don't believe it, that is like saying that i am still catholic even though i disagree with church teaching, well alot of them anyway.

would you like to tell us what particular passages you are talking about?

You just told me you are greek orthodox

I have an understanding of christianity, I believe the bible is true. You know christians consider it the Word Of God. I believe that Jesus came to earth, he is the Son of God and died on the cross for our sins, it is by grace we are saved when we have a relationship with him. What...

I am not going to bother arguing when you clearly think you are right.

I read NIV, and i think that there is only one inconsistancy in that, well one that i know of.

how did he found the orthodox church. It was all one church until the great schism then the orthodox church was founded, they were not reffered to as the orthodox church. I have no doubt that the early church was built on rock-solid foundations but the catholic church today is a different story.

I am not but what i believe tends to match up with the early church (I am talking Paul type early) which is shown through acts and the various epistles.

so are you saying that it is wrong to interpret the bible? and to not agree with church teaching if it does not line up with the book, it is suppose to be based on.